You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Tristan & Leroy, 2009, describe how lazy code motion can be certified correct. Loop-invariant code motion is cited as an instance. However, when I try current CompCert, or when I look into the source code, it seems that loop-invariant code motion ("hoisting") is not performed. Am I right?
Is this something planned?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not in the short term. The advanced optimizations + translation validation of Tristan are very nice but would need some more work to be put in the production compiler, in particular because they can be costly on large functions.
Tristan & Leroy, 2009, describe how lazy code motion can be certified correct. Loop-invariant code motion is cited as an instance. However, when I try current CompCert, or when I look into the source code, it seems that loop-invariant code motion ("hoisting") is not performed. Am I right?
Is this something planned?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: