New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GEANT4 : GetEnergyDeposit #12
Comments
We can see that the contribution of non ionizing energy is negligible (1/1000) and also if we make an infinite cut GetDeltaEnergy() and GetTotalEnergyDeposit() are the same. |
For the time being we continue using the equivalent to GetDeltaEnergy() but to avoid the warning we |
For getting the energy deposit in the gas we use now the function GetDeltaEnergyDeposit(). It is indeed the energy difference between the two step point. The function called before was GetTotalEnergyDeposit() which gives the total energy deposit in the gas for the tracked particle. The problem of this previous function is that it doesn't take into account the contribution of the delta electrons produce to the energy deposit in the gas.
Since we use this energy to calculate the number of electrons drifting to the pad plane, I'm wondering is it a good method to estimate the energy deposit in the gas?
Actually there is another function called GetNonIonizingEnergyDeposit() which gives the energy deposit in the gas not by ionization. So what is recommended to get the energy deposit by ionization is GetTotalEnergyDeposit()-GetNonIonizingEnergyDeposit().
I looked at the contribution of the NonIonizingEnergyDeposit and also the difference between total and delta energy deposit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: