www.bing.com

[adguard-bot]

Issue URL (Annoyance)

https://www.bing.com/search?toWww=1&redig=2AEC5FFEFBBB43D5A3EBCFE3AA269B2A&q=Bing+AI&showconv=1

Comment

<cib-message
  type="text"
  source="bot"
  mode="conversation"
  muid-consent=""
  serp-slot="none"
  product="bing"
  density="normal"
  table-version="1"
  katex-scroll=""
  output-background=""
  disable-citation-fix=""
  chat-type="consumer"
  chat-state="muid-user-consent-not-given"
>
  <slot name="playground-inner" slot="playground-inner"></slot>
  <slot name="playground-outer" slot="playground-outer"></slot>
</cib-message>;

Username: @rakleed

[NSFW] Screenshots

Screenshot 1

Screenshot 1

System configuration

Information	Value
AdGuard product:	AdGuard for Mac v2.13.0.1558 release
Browser:	Chrome
Stealth mode options:	Strip URLs from tracking parameters, Hide your search queries, Hide your Referrer from third-parties, Hide your User-Agent, Remove X-Client-Data header from HTTP requests, Protect against DPI, Disable cache for third-party requests, Block trackers
DNS filtering:	server: https://dns.cloudflare.com/dns-query
Filters:	Ad Blocking: AdGuard Base Privacy: AdGuard Tracking Protection, AdGuard URL Tracking Social Widgets: AdGuard Social Media Annoyances: AdGuard Cookie Notices, AdGuard Popups, AdGuard Mobile App Banners, AdGuard Other Annoyances, AdGuard Widgets Language-specific: AdGuard Russian
Userscripts:	IMDb Tomatoes (url: https://github.com/chocolateboy/userscripts/raw/master/src/imdb-tomatoes.user.js) Nova YouTube (url: https://update.greasyfork.org/scripts/433360/Nova%20YouTube.user.js) AdGuard Extra (url: https://userscripts.adtidy.org/release/adguard-extra/1.0/adguard-extra.user.js)

[jellizaveta]

@AdamWr Could you please check?

[AdamWr]

To reproduce it's necessary to use copilot.
If I'm not wrong, it's basing on some cookies, but it's rather "random" value, so if I'm not mistaken, set-cookie in this case will not works.
Another problem is that this button is in the shadow root, so trusted-click-element also doesn't work in this case.
We could add a JavaScript rule to click it automatically, something like:

bing.com#%#(()=>{if(!location.pathname.includes("/search"))return;const t={attributes:!0,childList:!0,subtree:!0},e=(t,e)=>{for(const n of t){const t=n.target.querySelector(".privacy-statement + .get-started-btn-wrapper > button.inline-explicit");t&&(t.click(),e.disconnect())}},n={apply:(n,o,c)=>{const r=Reflect.apply(n,o,c);if(o&&o.matches("cib-muid-consent")){new MutationObserver(e).observe(r,t)}return r}};window.Element.prototype.attachShadow=new Proxy(window.Element.prototype.attachShadow,n)})();

Code:

(() => {
  if (!location.pathname.includes('/search')) {
    return;
  }
  const config = {
    attributes: true,
    childList: true,
    subtree: true
  };
  const callback = (mutationList, observer) => {
    for (const mutation of mutationList) {
      const button = mutation.target.querySelector('.privacy-statement + .get-started-btn-wrapper > button.inline-explicit');
      if (button) {
        // debugger;
        button.click();
        observer.disconnect();
      }
    }
  };
  const wrapper = (target, thisArg, args) => {
    const shadowEl = Reflect.apply(target, thisArg, args);
    // Start observing the target node for configured mutations
    // only if target element is cib-muid-consent
    if (thisArg && thisArg.matches('cib-muid-consent')) {
      const observer = new MutationObserver(callback);
      observer.observe(shadowEl, config);
    }
    return shadowEl;
  };
  const handler = {
    apply: wrapper
  };
  window.Element.prototype.attachShadow = new Proxy(window.Element.prototype.attachShadow, handler);
})();

but I'm not sure if it should be added.

@Alex-302 should we fix it?

[Alex-302]

@AdamWr Why not?)

[AdamWr]

Okay, I will test this rule a bit more and add it tomorrow, if I do not notice any breakage.