Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Requesting more image file support #1

Open
yimeji opened this issue Nov 28, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Requesting more image file support #1

yimeji opened this issue Nov 28, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@yimeji
Copy link

yimeji commented Nov 28, 2021

Requesting file support for webp and gif.

@Aeonss
Copy link
Owner

Aeonss commented Dec 9, 2021

Hello, I will fix bugs and update the tool once finals weeks is over!

@Aeonss
Copy link
Owner

Aeonss commented Dec 16, 2021

Requesting file support for webp and gif.

Added webp file support.

I'm not sure how you want me to implement the gif stitching and splitting, I'm assuming you want the same thing but keep the animation as well. Or maybe you mean that the image is just 1 frame but happens to be a gif. Let me know what interpretation is correct.

Let me know if you find any bugs and I will try to fix them asap!

@Aeonss Aeonss closed this as completed Dec 16, 2021
@yimeji
Copy link
Author

yimeji commented Dec 16, 2021

Thank you very much.

Webp is enough.
Gif is very infrequent. Mostly weibo stuff because they have this thing that divide an image into in 3x3 squares. Sometimes one or more square in animated gif.

@ZeroCool940711
Copy link

Hi there, I'm using this issue to request support for a couple of other formats instead of opening a new issue for the same topic, I'm also requesting a few UI improvements that should make using the program better.

Add support for compressed files such as RAR, ZIP and CBZ, the software would just do the same as with folders and scan for images inside, they usually contain all the images in the root folder or a subfolder, this could be useful when dealing with stuff downloaded using something like FreeMangaDownloader, optionally, the output could be done using another file using the same format instead of a folder with individual images, an example would be when using a file called 0001 - Ch.001.cbz the result could be FileName.cbz, where "FileName" is the name we have specified on the UI under "Output Location", the resulting format could also be specified on the UI next to that option as it currently let you select between PNG and JPG, it could also be automatically selected as the same format that is used as input, the result file would be then on that "Output Location" also specified on the UI.

Another small improvement to the UI, if the "Output Location/Folder" does not exist StitchTool should use a default location when clicking on "Browse Output Location", sometimes when using StitchTool to stitch multiple files one after the other if you delete the previously used folder when you click on "Browse Output Location" to change it, it won't let you select the folder and you have to restart StitchTool so you can continue using it.

Last but not least, it would be nice to be able to resize the UI, even if you added support for collapsing the sections we don't want to use the UI is still left with the same size it had before which is too big and there is just a lot of empty space, when collapsing a section the UI should automatically resize or we at least should be able to resize it manually, currently neither option is available, at least on Windows.

Thanks for the time, have a good day and keep the good work.

@Aeonss Aeonss reopened this Dec 18, 2021
@Aeonss Aeonss added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 20, 2021
@Aeonss
Copy link
Owner

Aeonss commented Dec 29, 2021

I will work on doing recursive actions in folders. As for archives like zip, rar, cbz, it is better to just unpackage it and then repackage it. At most, the program will just unarchive the files, do the action, and then repackage them anyway in a temp folder, but I will look into it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants