-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Low Recall #1919
Comments
@clydebailey have you met the follow trouble? hope some advice |
@sporterman |
@clydebailey i'sure the two files are correct, are there any other paramsters i need change |
please show the .data and .names files along with the contents of training set. |
@clydebailey |
you dataset is coco? i only trained at pascal format, |
@yongcong1415 no. my personal dataset, now the obj is decreasing while training,,..... |
i mean you dataset format,you need use yolo_mark.exe to check you boxes position; |
Try maintaining your images under "JPEG images" and annotations under "Annotations". This is the file format for Pascal training. |
@clydebailey how to use yolo_mark to check my data and label, |
|
I am training an XNOR version of tiny-yolov2 with 7th and 8th layer in XNOR. I found out some lines commented out
133-136 from the convolutional_kernels.cu file.
https://github.com/AlexeyAB/darknet/blob/7f4b859514c7fcae1f9cc86276be31f133b5bc7c/src/convolutional_kernels.cu
After uncommenting these lines, i trained for more than 100,000 iterations and got a decent precision but a bad a recall.
Why were those lines commented in the convolutional_kernel.cu file when we need the binarization input state?
Why am I getting a bad recall rate?
precision: 0.59
TP: 107
FP:73
FN:8793
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: