Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better support for specifying state variables of composite machines #107

Open
slibkind opened this issue Jun 15, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@slibkind
Copy link
Collaborator

Following this discussion, it is clear that the current system places the onus of proper bookkeeping of the state of a composite machine on the user. A new feature that allows the user to use the wiring diagram to specify a state as a composite would reduce some of this burden.

There is also interest in having "stateful" machines, i.e. those which are equipped with a current state. This may have performance implications.

@slwu89
Copy link
Member

slwu89 commented Dec 1, 2022

link #88

@slibkind
Copy link
Collaborator Author

slibkind commented Dec 1, 2022

For delay differential equations also specify history functions as part of the machine

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants