You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been able to work around this because my cloud hosting provider has the bindings and the compiled binaries cached; however, this is not a long-term solution.
If, with the community's help, we can identify the outstanding issues with the node-zopfli package, I would be willing to create a fork and publish releases via GitHub Releases, so that it stops messing with this package.
Alternatively, I would suggest removing node-zopfli from this package to avoid the installation issue. Given that zopfli is only useful for static assets, it might not be such a big deal for users to remove.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't know how I feel about removing it. node-zopfli has been causing installation issues starting with Node >=10.0.0 but they can easily be avoided by running npm/yarn install --build-from-source to skip downloading prebuilt bindings.
The native binding api version was bumped in v10 so unless node-zopfli's author comes back and publishes new prebuilt bindings I'm afraid that won't be possible. 😞
Due to https://github.com/pierreinglebert/node-zopfli apparently being abandoned and consequently pierreinglebert/node-zopfli#87, it is becoming very difficult to install
shrink-ray-current
locally or in production without fatal errors.I've been able to work around this because my cloud hosting provider has the bindings and the compiled binaries cached; however, this is not a long-term solution.
If, with the community's help, we can identify the outstanding issues with the
node-zopfli
package, I would be willing to create a fork and publish releases via GitHub Releases, so that it stops messing with this package.Alternatively, I would suggest removing
node-zopfli
from this package to avoid the installation issue. Given thatzopfli
is only useful for static assets, it might not be such a big deal for users to remove.Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: