New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Display completion on multiple columns [FR] #195
Comments
This should be a feature request for |
It's not impossible to implement this on top of PS: Check out |
As NightMachinary said, this is impossible unless I fork fzf. (In fact, I indeed have such a plan) |
fzf might accept a PR there: junegunn/fzf#1476 |
Looks like junegunn also provided a solution using tmux, using an alternative command that is directly available from the fzf main repo:
It's not really the multicolumn layout I wished, but it can be an option, at least for someone. zstyle ':fzf-tab:*' fzf-command "fzf-tmux -r 20%" (this exact one is currently not working) |
Checkout https://github.com/Aloxaf/fzf-tab/wiki/Configuration#fzf-command if you want to use fzf-tmux |
@NICHOLAS85 I checked, and indeed I took the command above exactly from there, but it is not junegunn's Moreover P.S.: mine was a follow up on @NightMachinary 's linked PR, but it's rather off topic in this issue. |
Just a quick feature: multicolumns
Problem
Often my terminals are wider than taller.
Describe the solution you'd like
The one in the title.
Additional context
I just moved to
fzf-tab
from the default autocompletion coming withoh-my-zsh
. It's wonderful and plenty of features, but the very only thing I lack it's having the completion spanning the full length of my terminal.This is not always what I want: sometimes it's far better to have them on a single column, e.g. when the options are described, but this is exactly what happened with the former completion (
oh-my-zsh
).Probably it's just a matter of taste, but I tried to look in the repo, the wiki and the issues for configuring
fzf-tab
this way and I didn't find anything. Since quite a lot of other configs are available, why not this one? (the moment someone is able to implement it...)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: