Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFC-5: Reduce the number of string registers #5

Open
dr-orlovsky opened this issue Jul 4, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

RFC-5: Reduce the number of string registers #5

dr-orlovsky opened this issue Jul 4, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
@dr-orlovsky
Labels
proposal Proposal with specification enhancement S-implemented The change is implemented in the reference implementation but not yet a part of the specification
Milestone
ALU/1

Comments

@dr-orlovsky
Copy link
Member

Reduce the number of string registers down to 32 (from current 256); maintain ISA byte dimensions by using mod 32 (or mod 16 if an operation uses two string register indexes) to determine specific string register.

This will reduce memory requirements for on-chip registers from current > 16MB down to ~ 2MB
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky added proposal Proposal with specification enhancement S-accepted The protosal is accepted labels Jul 4, 2021
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky added this to the ALU/1 milestone Jul 4, 2021
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky self-assigned this Jul 4, 2021
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky added this to Backlog in AluVM via automation Jul 4, 2021
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky changed the title Reduce the number of string registers RFC-5: Reduce the number of string registers Jul 4, 2021
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky mentioned this issue Jul 4, 2021
Closed
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky added S-implemented The change is implemented in the reference implementation but not yet a part of the specification and removed S-accepted The protosal is accepted labels Jul 27, 2021
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky removed this from Backlog in AluVM Nov 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky

Labels
proposal Proposal with specification enhancement S-implemented The change is implemented in the reference implementation but not yet a part of the specification
Projects
None yet
Milestone
ALU/1
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dr-orlovsky