/
BMDs_and_ABDs_fitxxxBin.Rmd
568 lines (451 loc) · 22 KB
/
BMDs_and_ABDs_fitxxxBin.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
---
title: "Modelling Binomial Outcome Data using ABDs and BMDs"
output: rmarkdown::html_vignette
vignette: >
%\VignetteIndexEntry{Modelling Binomial Outcome Data using ABDs and BMDs}
%\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
---
```{r setup, include=FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE,comment = "|>")
library(fitODBOD)
library(ggplot2)
library(reshape2)
library(grid)
library(gridExtra)
library(bbmle)
library(tibble)
library(ggthemes)
library(flextable)
```
>IT WOULD BE CLEARLY BENEFICIAL FOR YOU BY USING THE RMD FILES IN THE GITHUB DIRECTORY FOR FURTHER EXPLANATION
OR UNDERSTANDING OF THE R CODE FOR THE RESULTS OBTAINED IN THE VIGNETTES.
Fitting Alternate Binomial or Binomial Mixture distribution is the most crucial part of while
handling Binomial Outcome Data. Finding the most suitable distribution which is similar to the
given data is very important and essential. In order to compare distributions after fitted we can
choose several measurements. They are namely
* Comparing actual frequency and estimated frequency.
* Using Chi-squared Test statistic and comparing p-values.
* Comparing actual variance with estimated variances of distributions.
* Comparing Negative Log Likelihood values of distributions.
* Comparing AIC values of distributions.
The functions given below are used to fit respective distributions when BOD and estimated
parameters are given.
* `fitBin` - fitting the Binomial distribution.
* `fitTriBin`- fitting the Triangular Binomial distribution.
* `fitBetaBin` - fitting the Beta-Binomial distribution.
* `fitKumBin` - fitting the Kumaraswamy Binomial distribution.
* `fitGHGBB` - fitting the Gaussian Hyper-geometric Generalized Beta-Binomial distribution.
* `fitMcGBB` - fitting the McDonald Generalized Beta-Binomial distribution.
* `fitGammaBin` - fitting Gamma Binomial distribution.
* `fitGrassiaIIBin` - fitting Grassia II Binomial distribution.
* `fitAddBin` - fitting the Additive Binomial distribution.
* `fitBetaCorrBin` - fitting the Beta Correlated Binomial distribution.
* `fitCOMPBin` - fitting the COM Poisson Binomial distribution.
* `fitCorrBin` - fitting the Correlated Binomial distribution.
* `fitMultiBin` - fitting the Multiplicative Binomial distribution.
* `fitLMBin` - fitting the Lovinson Multiplicative Binomial distribution.
## Fitting Alternate Binomial Distributions
All six Alternate Binomial distributions will be fitted to the Alcohol data week 2 and their expected frequencies
will be plotted with the actual frequency values. This is plot can be used to identify which distribution suits
best for the Alcohol data week 2.
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for Binomial Distribution, warning=FALSE}
Alcohol_data
BinRanVar <- Alcohol_data$Days
ActFreq <- Alcohol_data$week2
# Fitting Binomial Distribution
BinFreq <- fitBin(BinRanVar,ActFreq)
# printing the results of fitting Binomial distribution
print(BinFreq)
```
### Additive Binomial Distribution
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for Additive Binomial Distribution, warning=FALSE}
# Estimating and fitting Additive Binomial distribution
Para_AddBin <- EstMLEAddBin(BinRanVar,ActFreq)
# printing the coefficients and using them
coef(Para_AddBin)
AddBin_p <- Para_AddBin$p
AddBin_alpha <- Para_AddBin$alpha
# Fitting Additive Binomial Distribution
AddBinFreq <- fitAddBin(BinRanVar, ActFreq, AddBin_p, AddBin_alpha)
# printing the results of fitting Additive Binomial Distribution
print(AddBinFreq)
```
### Beta-Correlated Binomial Distribution
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for Beta-Correlated Binomial Distribution, warning=FALSE}
# Estimating and fitting Beta Correlated Binoial Distribution
Para_BetaCorrBin <- EstMLEBetaCorrBin(x=BinRanVar, freq=ActFreq,
cov=0.001,a=10,b=10)
# printing the coefficients and using them
coef(Para_BetaCorrBin)
BetaCorrBin_cov <- coef(Para_BetaCorrBin)[1]
BetaCorrBin_a <- coef(Para_BetaCorrBin)[2]
BetaCorrBin_b <- coef(Para_BetaCorrBin)[3]
# Fitting Beta-Correlated Binomial Distribution
BetaCorrBinFreq <- fitBetaCorrBin(BinRanVar,ActFreq,BetaCorrBin_cov,
BetaCorrBin_a,BetaCorrBin_b)
# printing the results of fitting Beta-Correlated Binomial Distribution
print(BetaCorrBinFreq)
```
### COM-Poisson Binomial Distribution
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for COM-Poisson Binomial Distribution, warning=FALSE}
# Estimating and fitting COM Poisson Binomial Distribution
Para_COMPBin <- EstMLECOMPBin(x=BinRanVar, freq=ActFreq,
v=12.1,p=0.9)
# printing the coefficients and using them
coef(Para_COMPBin)
COMPBin_p <- coef(Para_COMPBin)[1]
COMPBin_v <- coef(Para_COMPBin)[2]
# Fitting COM-Poisson Binomial Distribution
COMPBinFreq <- fitCOMPBin(BinRanVar, ActFreq,COMPBin_p,COMPBin_v)
# printing the results of fitting COM-Poisson Binomial Distribution
print(COMPBinFreq)
```
### Correlated Binomial Distribution
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for Correlated Binomial Distribution, warning=FALSE}
# Estimating and fitting Correlated Binomial Distribution
Para_CorrBin <- EstMLECorrBin(x=BinRanVar, freq=ActFreq,
cov=0.0021,p=0.19)
# printing the coefficients and using them
coef(Para_CorrBin)
CorrBin_p <- coef(Para_CorrBin)[1]
CorrBin_cov <- coef(Para_CorrBin)[2]
# Fitting Correlated Binomial Distribution
CorrBinFreq <- fitCorrBin(BinRanVar, ActFreq,CorrBin_p,CorrBin_cov)
# printing the results of fitting Correlated Binomial Distribution
print(CorrBinFreq)
```
### Multiplicative Binomial Distribution
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for Multiplicative Binomial Distribution, warning=FALSE}
# Estimating and fitting Multiplicative Binomial Distribution
Para_MultiBin <- EstMLEMultiBin(x=BinRanVar, freq=ActFreq,
theta=21,p=0.19)
# printing the coefficients and using them
coef(Para_MultiBin)
MultiBin_p <- coef(Para_MultiBin)[1]
MultiBin_theta <- coef(Para_MultiBin)[2]
# Fitting Multiplicative Binomial Distribution
MultiBinFreq <- fitMultiBin(BinRanVar, ActFreq,MultiBin_p,MultiBin_theta)
# printing the results of fitting Multiplicative Binomial Distribution
print(MultiBinFreq)
```
### Lovinson Multiplicative Binomial Distribution
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for Lovinson Multiplicative Binomial Distribution, warning=FALSE}
# Estimating and fitting Lovinson Multiplicative Binomial Distribution
Para_LMBin <- EstMLELMBin(x=BinRanVar, freq=ActFreq,
phi=21,p=0.19)
# printing the coefficients and using them
coef(Para_LMBin)
LMBin_p <- coef(Para_LMBin)[1]
LMBin_phi <- coef(Para_LMBin)[2]
# Fitting Lovinson Multiplicative Binomial Distribution
LMBinFreq <- fitLMBin(BinRanVar, ActFreq,LMBin_p,LMBin_phi)
# printing the results of fitting Multiplicative Binomial Distribution
print(LMBinFreq)
```
### Conclusion
```{r plotting that dataset for ABD,fig.align='center',fig.height=7,fig.width=9,echo=FALSE}
# creating dataset for plotting
ABD_Data <- tibble(
w=BinRanVar,
x=ActFreq,
y=fitted(BinFreq),
z=fitted(AddBinFreq),
a=fitted(BetaCorrBinFreq),
b=fitted(COMPBinFreq),
c=fitted(CorrBinFreq),
d=fitted(MultiBinFreq),
e=fitted(LMBinFreq)
)
names(ABD_Data) <- c("Bin_RV","Actual_Freq","EstFreq_BinD","EstFreq_AddBinD","EstFreq_BetaCorrBinD","EstFreq_COMPBinD",
"EstFreq_CorrBinD","EstFreq_MultiBinD","EstFreq_LMBinD")
```
```{r Flexxed Table ABD}
ABD_Total<-colSums(ABD_Data[,-1])
ABD_Variance<-c(var(rep(BinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=BinFreq$obs.freq)),
var(rep(BinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=BinFreq$exp.freq)),
var(rep(AddBinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=AddBinFreq$exp.freq)),
var(rep(BetaCorrBinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=BetaCorrBinFreq$exp.freq)),
var(rep(COMPBinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=COMPBinFreq$exp.freq)),
var(rep(CorrBinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=CorrBinFreq$exp.freq)),
var(rep(MultiBinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=MultiBinFreq$exp.freq)),
var(rep(LMBinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=LMBinFreq$exp.freq))
)
ABD_Variance<-round(ABD_Variance,4)
ABD_p_value<-c(BinFreq$p.value,
AddBinFreq$p.value,
BetaCorrBinFreq$p.value,
COMPBinFreq$p.value,
CorrBinFreq$p.value,
MultiBinFreq$p.value,
LMBinFreq$p.value)
ABD_NegLL<-c(AddBinFreq$NegLL,
BetaCorrBinFreq$NegLL,
COMPBinFreq$NegLL,
CorrBinFreq$NegLL,
MultiBinFreq$NegLL,
LMBinFreq$NegLL)
ABD_NegLL<-round(ABD_NegLL,4)
ABD_AIC<-c(AIC(AddBinFreq),
AIC(BetaCorrBinFreq),
AIC(COMPBinFreq),
AIC(CorrBinFreq),
AIC(MultiBinFreq),
AIC(LMBinFreq)
)
ABD_AIC<-round(ABD_AIC,4)
C_of_diff_Values<-c(length(ABD_Data$Actual_Freq),
sum(abs(ABD_Data$Actual_Freq-ABD_Data$EstFreq_BinD) <= 5),
sum(abs(ABD_Data$Actual_Freq-ABD_Data$EstFreq_AddBinD) <= 5),
sum(abs(ABD_Data$Actual_Freq-ABD_Data$EstFreq_BetaCorrBinD) <= 5),
sum(abs(ABD_Data$Actual_Freq-ABD_Data$EstFreq_COMPBinD) <= 5),
sum(abs(ABD_Data$Actual_Freq-ABD_Data$EstFreq_CorrBinD) <= 5),
sum(abs(ABD_Data$Actual_Freq-ABD_Data$EstFreq_MultiBinD) <= 5),
sum(abs(ABD_Data$Actual_Freq-ABD_Data$EstFreq_LMBinD) <= 5))
rbind(ABD_Data,
c("Total",ABD_Total),
c("Count of difference Values",C_of_diff_Values),
c("Variance",ABD_Variance),
c("p-value","-",ABD_p_value),
c("Negative Log Likelihood Value","-","-",ABD_NegLL),
c("AIC","-","-",ABD_AIC))->ABD_flexed_Data
flextable(data=ABD_flexed_Data,
col_keys = c("Bin_RV","Actual_Freq","EstFreq_BinD",
"EstFreq_AddBinD","EstFreq_BetaCorrBinD",
"EstFreq_COMPBinD","EstFreq_CorrBinD",
"EstFreq_MultiBinD","EstFreq_LMBinD")) %>%
theme_box() %>% autofit()%>%
bold(i=1,part = "header") %>%
bold(i=c(9:14),j=1,part = "body") %>%
align(i=c(1:14),j=c(1:9),align = "center") %>%
set_header_labels(values = c(Bin_RV="Binomial Random Variable",
Actual_Freq="Observed Frequencies",
EstFreq_BinD="Binomial Distribution",
EstFreq_AddBinD="Additive Binomial Distribution",
EstFreq_BetaCorrBinD="Beta-Correlated Binomial Distribution",
EstFreq_COMPBinD="Composite Binomial Distribution",
EstFreq_CorrBinD="Correlated Binomial Distribution",
EstFreq_MultiBinD="Multiplicative Binomial Distribution",
EstFreq_LMBinD="Lovinson Multiplicative Binomial Distribution")) %>%
align(i=1,part = "header",align = "center")
```
It is clearly visible that Additive and Correlated Binomial distributions behave very similarly, both
generate same frequency values. Although they are close to actual frequencies. Comparing Binomial
distribution generated expected frequencies with actual frequencies will lead to see that there is very
much difference and Binomial distribution does not suit this Alcohol data of week 2. Multiplicative
and COM Poisson Binomial distributions show close values to actual frequencies. Multiplicative and Lovinson
Multiplicative distributions are behaving similarly as a pair.
Finally, the only distribution left is Beta Correlated Binomial distribution which shows more closeness to actual
frequencies. Therefore it is clear that most suitable distribution for alcohol data week 2 is Beta Correlated Binomial
distribution, second choice is Multiplicative and COM Poisson Binomial distributions and final choice is
Correlated and Additive Binomial distributions.
## Fitting Binomial Mixture Distributions
In the eight BMD distributions except Uniform Binomial distribution others can be used for fitting the
Alcohol data week 2. Here also as above a plot was generated to compare estimated frequencies
with actual frequency.
### Triangular Binomial Distribution
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for Triangular Binomial Distribution,warning=FALSE}
# Estimating and fitting Triangular Binomial distribution
Para_TriBin <- EstMLETriBin(BinRanVar,ActFreq)
# printing the coefficients and using them
coef(Para_TriBin)
TriBin_c <- Para_TriBin$mode
# Fitting Triangular Binomial Distribution
TriBinFreq <- fitTriBin(BinRanVar, ActFreq, TriBin_c)
# printing the results of fitting Triangular Binomial Distribution
print(TriBinFreq)
```
### Beta-Binomial Distribution
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for Beta-Binomial Distribution,warning=FALSE}
# Estimating and fitting Beta Correlated Binoial Distribution
Para_BetaBin <- EstMLEBetaBin(x=BinRanVar, freq=ActFreq,
a=10,b=10)
# printing the coefficients and using them
coef(Para_BetaBin)
BetaBin_a <- coef(Para_BetaBin)[1]
BetaBin_b <- coef(Para_BetaBin)[2]
# Fitting Beta-Binomial Distribution
BetaBinFreq <- fitBetaBin(BinRanVar, ActFreq,BetaBin_a,BetaBin_b)
# printing the results of fitting Beta-Binomial Distribution
print(BetaBinFreq)
```
### Kumaraswamy Binomial Distribution
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for Kumaraswamy Binomial Distribution,warning=FALSE}
# Estimating and fitting Kumaraswamy Binomial Distribution
Para_KumBin <- EstMLEKumBin(x=BinRanVar, freq=ActFreq,
a=12.1,b=0.9,it=10000)
# printing the coefficients and using them
coef(Para_KumBin)
KumBin_a <- coef(Para_KumBin)[1]
KumBin_b <- coef(Para_KumBin)[2]
KumBin_it <- coef(Para_KumBin)[3]
# Fitting Kumaraswamy Binomial Distribution
KumBinFreq <- fitKumBin(BinRanVar, ActFreq,KumBin_a,KumBin_b,KumBin_it*10)
# printing the results of fitting Kumaraswamy Binomial Distribution
print(KumBinFreq)
```
### GHGBB Distribution
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for GHGBB Distribution,warning=FALSE}
# Estimating and fitting GHGBB Distribution
Para_GHGBB <- EstMLEGHGBB(x=BinRanVar, freq=ActFreq,
a=0.0021,b=0.19,c=0.3)
# printing the coefficients and using them
coef(Para_GHGBB)
GHGBB_a <- coef(Para_GHGBB)[1]
GHGBB_b <- coef(Para_GHGBB)[2]
GHGBB_c <- coef(Para_GHGBB)[3]
# Fitting GHGBB Distribution
GHGBBFreq <- fitGHGBB(BinRanVar, ActFreq,GHGBB_a,GHGBB_b,GHGBB_c)
# printing the results of fitting GHGBB Distribution
print(GHGBBFreq)
```
### McGBB Distribution
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for McGBB Distribution,warning=FALSE}
# Estimating and fitting McGBB Distribution
Para_McGBB <- EstMLEMcGBB(x=BinRanVar, freq=ActFreq,
a=21,b=0.19,c=0.1)
# printing the coefficients and using them
coef(Para_McGBB)
McGBB_a <- coef(Para_McGBB)[1]
McGBB_b <- coef(Para_McGBB)[2]
McGBB_c <- coef(Para_McGBB)[3]
# Fitting McGBB Distribution
McGBBFreq <- fitMcGBB(BinRanVar, ActFreq,McGBB_a,McGBB_b,McGBB_c)
# printing the results of fitting McGBB Distribution
print(McGBBFreq)
```
### Gamma Binomial Distribution
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for Gamma Binomial Distribution,warning=FALSE}
# Estimating and fitting Gamma Binoial Distribution
Para_GammaBin <- EstMLEGammaBin(x=BinRanVar, freq=ActFreq,
c=10,l=10)
# printing the coefficients and using them
coef(Para_GammaBin)
GammaBin_c <- coef(Para_GammaBin)[1]
GammaBin_l <- coef(Para_GammaBin)[2]
# Fitting Gamma Binomial Distribution
GammaBinFreq <- fitGammaBin(BinRanVar, ActFreq,GammaBin_c,GammaBin_l)
# printing the results of fitting Beta-Binomial Distribution
print(GammaBinFreq)
```
### Grassia II Binomial Distribution
```{r plotting Expected frequencies with actual frequency for Grassia II Binomial Distribution,warning=FALSE}
# Estimating and fitting Grassia II Binoial Distribution
Para_GrassiaIIBin <- EstMLEGrassiaIIBin(x=BinRanVar, freq=ActFreq,
a=10,b=10)
# printing the coefficients and using them
coef(Para_GrassiaIIBin)
GrassiaIIBin_a <- coef(Para_GrassiaIIBin)[1]
GrassiaIIBin_b <- coef(Para_GrassiaIIBin)[2]
# Fitting Grassia II Binomial Distribution
GrassiaIIBinFreq <- fitGrassiaIIBin(BinRanVar, ActFreq,GrassiaIIBin_a,GrassiaIIBin_b)
# printing the results of fitting Grassia II Binomial Distribution
print(GrassiaIIBinFreq)
```
### Conclusion
```{r plotting that dataset for BMD,fig.align='center',fig.height=7,fig.width=9,echo=FALSE}
BMD_Data <- tibble(
w=BinRanVar,
x=ActFreq,
y=fitted(BinFreq),
z=fitted(TriBinFreq),
a=fitted(BetaBinFreq),
b=fitted(KumBinFreq),
c=fitted(GHGBBFreq),
d=fitted(McGBBFreq),
e=fitted(GammaBinFreq),
f=fitted(GrassiaIIBinFreq)
)
names(BMD_Data) <- c("Bin_RV","Actual_Freq","EstFreq_BinD","EstFreq_TriBinD","EstFreq_BetaBinD","EstFreq_KumBinD",
"EstFreq_GHGBBD","EstFreq_McGBBD","EstFreq_GammaBinD","EstFreq_GrassiaIIBinD")
```
```{r Flexxed Table BMD}
BMD_Total<-colSums(BMD_Data[,-1])
BMD_Variance<-c(var(rep(BinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=BinFreq$obs.freq)),
var(rep(BinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=BinFreq$exp.freq)),
var(rep(TriBinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=TriBinFreq$exp.freq)),
var(rep(BetaBinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=BetaBinFreq$exp.freq)),
var(rep(KumBinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=KumBinFreq$exp.freq)),
var(rep(GHGBBFreq$bin.ran.var,times=GHGBBFreq$exp.freq)),
var(rep(McGBBFreq$bin.ran.var,times=McGBBFreq$exp.freq)),
var(rep(GammaBinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=GammaBinFreq$exp.freq)),
var(rep(GrassiaIIBinFreq$bin.ran.var,times=GrassiaIIBinFreq$exp.freq))
)
BMD_Variance<-round(BMD_Variance,4)
BMD_p_value<-c(BinFreq$p.value,
TriBinFreq$p.value,
BetaBinFreq$p.value,
KumBinFreq$p.value,
GHGBBFreq$p.value,
McGBBFreq$p.value,
GammaBinFreq$p.value,
GrassiaIIBinFreq$p.value)
BMD_NegLL<-c(TriBinFreq$NegLL,
BetaBinFreq$NegLL,
KumBinFreq$NegLL,
GHGBBFreq$NegLL,
McGBBFreq$NegLL,
GammaBinFreq$NegLL,
GrassiaIIBinFreq$NegLL)
BMD_NegLL<-round(BMD_NegLL,4)
BMD_AIC<-c(AIC(TriBinFreq),
AIC(BetaBinFreq),
AIC(KumBinFreq),
AIC(GHGBBFreq),
AIC(McGBBFreq),
AIC(GammaBinFreq),
AIC(GrassiaIIBinFreq))
BMD_AIC<-round(BMD_AIC,4)
C_of_diff_Values<-c(length(BMD_Data$Actual_Freq),
sum(abs(BMD_Data$Actual_Freq-BMD_Data$EstFreq_BinD) <= 5),
sum(abs(BMD_Data$Actual_Freq-BMD_Data$EstFreq_TriBinD) <= 5),
sum(abs(BMD_Data$Actual_Freq-BMD_Data$EstFreq_BetaBinD) <= 5),
sum(abs(BMD_Data$Actual_Freq-BMD_Data$EstFreq_KumBinD) <= 5),
sum(abs(BMD_Data$Actual_Freq-BMD_Data$EstFreq_GHGBBD) <= 5),
sum(abs(BMD_Data$Actual_Freq-BMD_Data$EstFreq_McGBBD) <= 5),
sum(abs(BMD_Data$Actual_Freq-BMD_Data$EstFreq_GammaBinD) <= 5),
sum(abs(BMD_Data$Actual_Freq-BMD_Data$EstFreq_GrassiaIIBinD) <= 5))
Overdispersion_BMD<-c(Overdispersion(TriBinFreq),
Overdispersion(BetaBinFreq),
Overdispersion(KumBinFreq),
Overdispersion(GHGBBFreq),
Overdispersion(McGBBFreq),
Overdispersion(GammaBinFreq),
Overdispersion(GrassiaIIBinFreq))
rbind(BMD_Data,
c("Total",BMD_Total),
c("Count of difference Values",C_of_diff_Values),
c("Variance",BMD_Variance),
c("p-value","-",BMD_p_value),
c("Negative Log Likelihood Value","-","-",BMD_NegLL),
c("AIC","-","-",BMD_AIC))->BMD_flexed_Data
flextable(data=BMD_flexed_Data,
col_keys = c("Bin_RV","Actual_Freq","EstFreq_BinD",
"EstFreq_TriBinD","EstFreq_BetaBinD",
"EstFreq_KumBinD","EstFreq_GHGBBD",
"EstFreq_McGBBD","EstFreq_GammaBinD",
"EstFreq_GrassiaIIBinD")) %>%
theme_box() %>% autofit()%>%
bold(i=1,part = "header") %>%
bold(i=c(9:14),j=1,part = "body") %>%
align(i=c(1:14),j=c(1:10),align = "center") %>%
set_header_labels(values = c(Bin_RV="Binomial Random Variable",
Actual_Freq="Observed Frequencies",
EstFreq_BinD="Binomial Distribution",
EstFreq_TriBinD="Triangular Binomial Distribution",
EstFreq_BetaBinD="Beta Binomial Distribution",
EstFreq_KumBinD="Kumaraswamy Binomial Distribution",
EstFreq_GHGBBD="Gaussian Hypergeometric Generalized Beta Binomial Distribution",
EstFreq_McGBBD="McDonald Generalized Beta Binomial Distribution",
EstFreq_GammaBinD="Gamma Binomial Distribution",
EstFreq_GrassiaIIBinD="Grassia II Binomial Distribution")) %>%
align(i=1,part = "header",align = "center")
```
Estimated frequencies from Triangular distribution are far more better than estimated
frequencies from Binomial distribution. It is clear that Beta-Binomial, Kumaraswamy Binomial,
Gamma Binomial and Grassia II Binomial distributions behave identically for the alcohol data
of week 2. Also McDonald Generalized Beta-Binomial distribution too behave equally for the alcohol
data of week 2.
Finally, Gaussian Hyper-geometric Generalized Beta-Binomial distribution is
best suited and generates more accurate frequencies. Therefore, first choice is GHGBB
distribution and second choice would be McGBB distribution.