Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improving Search: Show/filter by python version that package is built against. #281

Closed
naught101 opened this issue Feb 9, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@naught101
Copy link

If I do something like anaconda search <package> then I get a nice table of all of the available packages on anaconda.org that are available for download. The table shows the repo name, the package version, package type, and platform, as well as comments. However, it's not possible to tell from this table whether the package will be installable, even if it's on the right platform, because it's likely to be built against a different version of python.

A couple of improvements would really help the search functionality:

  • Show the versions of python and anything else relevant that the package is built against, e.g. py34 or np19py35.
  • Allow the results to be filtered by platform. When I'm on Linux, I don't care about Windows of OSX builds, and vice-versa
    • Also, allow filtering by python version (e.g. if the current env is using python 3.5, only show packages built against 3.5)
  • Add a comment at the end of the table that describes how to install the package - e.g. "To install a package, use conda install -c http://conda.anaconda.org/<repository> <package>." (I know that I for one can never remember this URL - it's quite annoying).

These little things would make using anaconda much more pain-free.

@stephenakearns
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @naught101 these are all good suggestions. thanks for taking the time to mention them. We'll include them in our planning going forward.

@goanpeca goanpeca modified the milestone: 1.7 Feb 7, 2017
@j0hn j0hn self-assigned this Aug 25, 2017
@j0hn j0hn closed this as completed in #428 Aug 29, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants