Here is the result on MacBook Pro (13-inch, M1, 2020), Apple M1, 8 cores (4 performance and 4 efficiency), 8 GB RAM
For aiohttp -
> wrk -d10s -t8 -c240 http://127.0.0.1:8000/hello
Running 10s test @ http://127.0.0.1:8000/hello
8 threads and 240 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 35.06ms 44.90ms 412.88ms 84.98%
Req/Sec 1.56k 444.76 5.09k 77.25%
124255 requests in 10.01s, 19.91MB read
Socket errors: connect 0, read 102, write 0, timeout 0
Requests/sec: 12409.50
Transfer/sec: 1.99MB
> wrk -d10s -t8 -c240 http://127.0.0.1:8000/order
Running 10s test @ http://127.0.0.1:8000/order
8 threads and 240 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 50.83ms 52.31ms 386.97ms 83.64%
Req/Sec 774.89 219.09 1.73k 69.62%
61807 requests in 10.03s, 14.85MB read
Socket errors: connect 0, read 101, write 0, timeout 0
Requests/sec: 6161.43
Transfer/sec: 1.48MB
For sanic -
> wrk -d10s -t8 -c240 http://127.0.0.1:8000/hello
Running 10s test @ http://127.0.0.1:8000/hello
8 threads and 240 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 13.69ms 14.63ms 171.07ms 87.96%
Req/Sec 2.85k 1.00k 6.25k 76.12%
226992 requests in 10.02s, 24.89MB read
Socket errors: connect 0, read 141, write 0, timeout 0
Requests/sec: 22644.41
Transfer/sec: 2.48MB
> wrk -d10s -t8 -c240 http://127.0.0.1:8000/order
Running 10s test @ http://127.0.0.1:8000/order
8 threads and 240 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 42.91ms 45.96ms 320.13ms 83.70%
Req/Sec 0.98k 277.75 2.04k 70.96%
77888 requests in 10.05s, 13.22MB read
Socket errors: connect 0, read 126, write 0, timeout 0
Requests/sec: 7750.49
Transfer/sec: 1.32MB
For fastApi -
> wrk -d10s -t8 -c240 http://127.0.0.1:8000/hello
Running 10s test @ http://127.0.0.1:8000/hello
8 threads and 240 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 30.33ms 24.27ms 215.15ms 68.17%
Req/Sec 1.09k 348.97 2.36k 70.00%
86908 requests in 10.04s, 11.44MB read
Socket errors: connect 0, read 97, write 0, timeout 0
Requests/sec: 8653.16
Transfer/sec: 1.14MB
> wrk -d10s -t8 -c240 http://127.0.0.1:8000/order
Running 10s test @ http://127.0.0.1:8000/order
8 threads and 240 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 43.16ms 27.80ms 283.60ms 68.00%
Req/Sec 720.17 124.58 1.24k 71.62%
57490 requests in 10.04s, 11.73MB read
Socket errors: connect 0, read 100, write 0, timeout 0
Requests/sec: 5727.53
Transfer/sec: 1.17MB
For zero -
> wrk -d10s -t8 -c240 http://127.0.0.1:8000/hello
Running 10s test @ http://127.0.0.1:8000/hello
8 threads and 240 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 15.10ms 9.91ms 43.16ms 47.27%
Req/Sec 1.99k 777.55 3.64k 70.50%
158706 requests in 10.01s, 25.43MB read
Socket errors: connect 0, read 101, write 0, timeout 0
Requests/sec: 15853.92
Transfer/sec: 2.54MB
> wrk -d10s -t8 -c240 http://127.0.0.1:8000/order
Running 10s test @ http://127.0.0.1:8000/order
8 threads and 240 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 24.59ms 21.15ms 94.09ms 62.77%
Req/Sec 1.42k 614.40 8.39k 60.80%
112807 requests in 10.10s, 27.76MB read
Socket errors: connect 0, read 102, write 0, timeout 0
Requests/sec: 11167.89
Transfer/sec: 2.75MB
From the above numbers we can see only sanic has higher "hello world" performance than zero but again loses in the real-life example of redis order saving.
In short -
| Framework | "hello world" example | redis save example |
|---|---|---|
| aiohttp | 12,409.50 req/s | 6,161.43 req/s |
| sanic | 22,644.41 req/s | 7,750.49 req/s |
| fastApi | 8,653.16 req/s | 5,727.53 req/s |
| zero | 15,853.92 req/s | 11,167.89 req/s |