Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

API Editor: Support for Security Schemes & Security Requirements #244

Closed
EricWittmann opened this issue Feb 23, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Comments

@EricWittmann
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Nessworthy
Copy link

I think this is the closest related issue I can tag on to here! A fantastic bit of software, by the way!

Exporting shows the added security schemes in the shared components, but there's nowhere these can be applied. Although defined, they currently do nothing mechanically:

All objects defined within the components object will have no effect on the API unless they are explicitly referenced from properties outside the components object.

Security schemes can be applied to the global and operational level, but the app doesn't support either at the moment. It would be useful to add this functionality in, particularly for schemes which provide scopes to indicate what scopes are required for specific operations.

@EricWittmann EricWittmann changed the title API Editor: Support for re-usable Security Schemes API Editor: Support for re-usable Security Schemes & Security Requirements Apr 16, 2018
@EricWittmann
Copy link
Member Author

Yep - Security Requirement support is missing. Hoping to add that in this week.

@EricWittmann EricWittmann changed the title API Editor: Support for re-usable Security Schemes & Security Requirements API Editor: Support for Security Schemes & Security Requirements Apr 16, 2018
@EricWittmann
Copy link
Member Author

Good progress on this. Will be done and released this week. FYI.

@EricWittmann
Copy link
Member Author

Done and released. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants