Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Allowing the import of already archived URLs. #457

Closed
4 of 9 tasks
dbeley opened this issue Aug 23, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed
4 of 9 tasks

Feature Request: Allowing the import of already archived URLs. #457

dbeley opened this issue Aug 23, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
status: idea-phase Work is tentatively approved and is being planned / laid out, but is not ready to be implemented yet why: functionality Intended to improve ArchiveBox functionality or features

Comments

@dbeley
Copy link

dbeley commented Aug 23, 2020

Type

  • General question or discussion
  • Propose a brand new feature
  • Request modification of existing behavior or design

What is the problem that your feature request solves

Hi, thanks a lot for ArchiveBox! In the documentation, it's stated that "[..] ArchiveBox will never re-download sites that have already succeeded previously."

But what if I wanted to periodically export a website whose content's change are interesting, for example the frontpage of a newspaper website?

Having a way to export the same website several times could provide several snapshots over months or years that could be very interesting.

Describe the ideal specific solution you'd want, and whether it fits into any broader scope of changes

I think an optional argument to the archivebox add command would fit ideally. It could be named --force-add or --add-if-present or any similar name (I'm bad at naming things). A general configuration settings could also be considered, but I think the optional argument is more fitting.

I don't know the underlying changes required specially to the database models, so I can't really estimate the difficulty of my request.

Thanks in advance!

How badly do you want this new feature?

  • It's an urgent deal-breaker, I can't live without it
  • It's important to add it in the near-mid term future
  • It would be nice to have eventually

  • I'm willing to contribute dev time / money to fix this issue
  • I like ArchiveBox so far / would recommend it to a friend
  • I've had a lot of difficulty getting ArchiveBox set up
@dbeley dbeley added why: functionality Intended to improve ArchiveBox functionality or features status: idea-phase Work is tentatively approved and is being planned / laid out, but is not ready to be implemented yet labels Aug 23, 2020
@pirate
Copy link
Member

pirate commented Aug 23, 2020

Duplicate: #179

@pirate pirate closed this as completed Aug 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: idea-phase Work is tentatively approved and is being planned / laid out, but is not ready to be implemented yet why: functionality Intended to improve ArchiveBox functionality or features
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants