Incorrect use of version number in ontology IRIs

[timathom]

According to the OWL spec and general best practices (see section 2.4), the version number of an ontology release should not be included in the IRI of the current version. Unfortunately, all classes and properties defined in ARM have “1.0” in their IRI, which should be removed (the base IRI of the ontology is defined without the version number).

As an example of a frequently changing ontology that is diligent about versioning, see the gist ontology, maintained by Semantic Arts.

[timathom]

Bumping this issue... Here's a blog post that give a good overview of the ontology versioning topic.