Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(nvim-coverage): updated old keyword #723

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2024

Conversation

jduhamel
Copy link
Contributor

changed requires to dependencies as per lazy.nvim

馃搼 Description

Changes init.lua in test/nvim-coverage

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Review Checklist

Does this PR follow the [Contribution Guidelines](development guidelines)? Following is a partial checklist:

Proper conventional commit scoping:

  • If you are adding a new plugin, the scope would be the name of the category it is being added into. ex. feat(utility): added noice.nvim plugin

  • If you are modifying a pre-existing plugin or pack, the scope would be the name of the plugin folder. ex. fix(noice-nvim): fix LSP handler error

  • Pull request title has the appropriate conventional commit type and scope where the scope is the name of the pre-existing directory in the project as described above

  • README is properly formatted and uses fenced in links with <url> unless they are inside a [title](url)

  • Proper usage of opts table rather than setting things up with the config function.

@jduhamel jduhamel changed the title fix(test/nvim-complete): updated old keyword fix(nvim-complete): updated old keyword Jan 16, 2024
@jduhamel jduhamel changed the title fix(nvim-complete): updated old keyword fix(nvim-coverage): updated old keyword Jan 16, 2024
changed requires to dependencies as per lazy.nvim
Copy link
Member

@mehalter mehalter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks!

@mehalter mehalter merged commit 3304429 into AstroNvim:main Jan 16, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants