Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[meta issue] confusing Python package strategy #1325

Closed
lostmygithubaccount opened this issue Feb 8, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

[meta issue] confusing Python package strategy #1325

lostmygithubaccount opened this issue Feb 8, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
2.0 Planned for next major ADO Issue is documented on MSFT ADO for internal tracking MLOps product-gap product gaps

Comments

@lostmygithubaccount lostmygithubaccount self-assigned this Feb 8, 2021
@lostmygithubaccount lostmygithubaccount added MLOps product-gap product gaps 2.0 Planned for next major labels Feb 8, 2021
@lostmygithubaccount
Copy link
Contributor Author

"the v2 core SDK will be named "azure-ml" and we [will] have a very very high bar on releasing new packages"

@lostmygithubaccount
Copy link
Contributor Author

#516

@lostmygithubaccount
Copy link
Contributor Author

#1341

@lostmygithubaccount
Copy link
Contributor Author

#1355

@lostmygithubaccount
Copy link
Contributor Author

tangentially related, all of our issues with dependencies - pyjwt, cryptography, pip, pyarrow, etc.: #1379

@v-strudm-msft v-strudm-msft added the ADO Issue is documented on MSFT ADO for internal tracking label Apr 24, 2021
@lostmygithubaccount lostmygithubaccount removed their assignment Jul 23, 2022
@lostmygithubaccount lostmygithubaccount closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jun 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2.0 Planned for next major ADO Issue is documented on MSFT ADO for internal tracking MLOps product-gap product gaps
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants