Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 24, 2023. It is now read-only.

fix: availabilityZones value in template to read from parameter #3767

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 1, 2020

Conversation

manishram
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Fix availabilityZones value in template to read from parameter

Reason for Change:
The availability zone of virtualMachineScaleSets is specified directly in the template file instead of reading from the parameter file.

Issue Fixed:
Fixes #3762

fix: Bug Fixes 🐞

Earlier:
grege4r

Now:
reef

@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Aug 31, 2020

💖 Thanks for opening your first pull request! 💖 We use semantic commit messages to streamline the release process. Before your pull request can be merged, you should make sure your first commit and PR title start with a semantic prefix. Examples of commit messages with semantic prefixes: - fix: change azure disk cachingMode to ReadOnly - feat: make maximumLoadBalancerRuleCount configurable - docs: add note on AKS Engine and AKS relationship
Make sure to check out the developer guide for guidance on testing your change.

@manishram manishram changed the title Fix availabilityZones value in template to read from parameter fix: availabilityZones value in template to read from parameter Aug 31, 2020
@jackfrancis
Copy link
Member

@manishram Thanks! can you get rid of the change in the vendor directory (may have been a local go mod artifact)?

@manishram
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jackfrancis should I revert the change in line number 2488 and do that for line number 10636 or completely revert changes from that file?

@jackfrancis
Copy link
Member

/azp run pr-e2e

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@manishram
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jackfrancis why tests are failing? Any more changes I need to do?

@jackfrancis
Copy link
Member

/azp run pr-e2e

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 31, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #3767 into master will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3767      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.20%   73.19%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         148      148              
  Lines       25372    25378       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        18573    18576       +3     
- Misses       5663     5666       +3     
  Partials     1136     1136              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/engine/virtualmachinescalesets.go 79.96% <0.00%> (-0.41%) ⬇️
pkg/engine/templates_generated.go 53.42% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/engine/template_generator.go 82.19% <0.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6e38aa8...5fe6e52. Read the comment docs.

@manishram
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jackfrancis what is the cause for failing?

@jackfrancis
Copy link
Member

/azp run pr-e2e

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@manishram
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jackfrancis still some problem with codecov

@jackfrancis
Copy link
Member

@manishram don't worry about the codecov check, thanks for this contribution!

Copy link
Member

@jackfrancis jackfrancis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@acs-bot acs-bot added the lgtm label Sep 1, 2020
@jackfrancis jackfrancis merged commit c906633 into Azure:master Sep 1, 2020
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Sep 1, 2020

Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉🎉🎉

@acs-bot
Copy link

acs-bot commented Sep 1, 2020

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jackfrancis, manishram

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
3 participants