Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 14, 2023. It is now read-only.

Why do we use resource_group rather than resource_group_name? #96

Closed
Juliehzl opened this issue Feb 14, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Why do we use resource_group rather than resource_group_name? #96

Juliehzl opened this issue Feb 14, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@qiaozha
Labels
priority_p1_important important but not blocking type_bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Juliehzl
Copy link
Contributor

Because I want to use cli build-in function get_default_location_from_resource_group() as I have mention in #43 (comment).

But the function will utilize the resource_group_name in namespace. May I know why we use resource_group in custom_function not resource_group_name as what is required in SDK?
@qiaozha
Copy link
Member

qiaozha commented Feb 17, 2020

#47 this is already been fixed in the latest code. May I know what autorest command are you using now?

@RodgeFu RodgeFu added priority_p1_important important but not blocking type_bug Something isn't working version_2020-03 labels Feb 17, 2020
@RodgeFu RodgeFu added this to 2020-2-17 in IssueTracker Feb 17, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@qiaozha qiaozha

Labels
priority_p1_important important but not blocking type_bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@RodgeFu @zikalino @Juliehzl @qiaozha