Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update application-gateway-faq.md #7805

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 30, 2018
Merged

Update application-gateway-faq.md #7805

merged 2 commits into from Apr 30, 2018

Conversation

ChrisLopezUK
Copy link

Added a small section on Connection Draining on request of a customer.

Q. Does changing backend pool members cause disruption?

Added a small section on Connection Draining on request of a customer.

Q. Does changing backend pool members cause disruption?
@PRMerger17
Copy link
Contributor

@ChrisLopezUK : Thanks for your contribution! The author, @davidmu1, has been notified to review your proposed change.

@vhorne
Copy link
Contributor

vhorne commented Apr 27, 2018

@ChrisLopezUK

Hi Chris, thanks for the submission. I discussed with Amit (the App Gateway PM) and likes the idea, but would rather focus a bit more on the connection draining feature. So something more along the lines of:

Does application gateway support connection draining?

Yes. You can configure connection draining to change members within a backend pool without disruption. This will allow existing connections to continue to be sent to their previous destination until either that connection is closed or a configurable timeout expires. Note that connection draining only waits for current in-flight connections to complete. Application Gateway is not aware of application session state.

Copy link
Contributor

@vhorne vhorne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See Conversation for suggested wording.

Copy link
Author

@ChrisLopezUK ChrisLopezUK left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect. :)

Thank you!

@vhorne
Copy link
Contributor

vhorne commented Apr 30, 2018

@ChrisLopezUK

OK, go ahead and update your PR, and I'll sign-off so it gets merged. We'll probably also need a bit more supporting info about connection draining elsewhere in the content, so we'll see if we can find a place where it fits.

@ChrisLopezUK
Copy link
Author

Hi Vic,

I am a bit of GitHub novice so I am hoping I have made the changes correctly.

Please let me know if I have done anything incorrectly.

@PRMerger13
Copy link
Contributor

@ChrisLopezUK : Thanks for your contribution! The author, @davidmu1, has been notified to review your proposed change.

@vhorne
Copy link
Contributor

vhorne commented Apr 30, 2018

Looks good.
#sign-off

@PRMerger8
Copy link
Contributor

@vhorne: I'm sorry - only the author of this article, @davidmu1, can sign off on your changes. But we do have an exception process - if you are on the Microsoft content or product team for this product area, you can ask the PR review team to review and merge it by sending mail to the techdocprs alias.

@davidmu1
Copy link
Contributor

#sign-off

@v-shils v-shils merged commit 2e3864f into MicrosoftDocs:master Apr 30, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

10 participants