We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Coming out of #39 we decided to move go with approach 5. get methods will become singular methods one level up the object hierarchy:
get
// Current client.databases.get(id) client.databases.get(id).containers.get(id) client.databases.get(id).containers.get(id).items.get(id) // New client.database(id) client.database(id).container(id) client.database(id).container(id).item(id)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Are you putting .database only on the common parent, or also under the plural?
.database
Can I do both of these or just the first one?
client.database(id) client.databases.database(id)
Sorry, something went wrong.
My thought was only on the common parent for now. Not opposed to having it both places, but would like to try Proxy for that first.
@southpolesteve - this is done now? #43
Yes
No branches or pull requests
Coming out of #39 we decided to move go with approach 5.
get
methods will become singular methods one level up the object hierarchy:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: