Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Integration of Infrastructure Tools via azd #2312

Open
JayDoubleu opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Integration of Infrastructure Tools via azd #2312

JayDoubleu opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
@gkulin
Labels
customer-reported identify a customer issue pm Requires PM spec or in-depth input before implementation question
Milestone
Backlog

Comments

@JayDoubleu
Copy link
Contributor

It would be beneficial to be able to invoke infrastructure tools using azd, such as azd bicep, azd terraform, and azd pulumi. This feature would allow us to utilize replaced file tokens and execute these commands for a variety of purposes, including but not limited to deployment planning (e.g., azd terraform plan, azd az deployment what-if, etc.).

Related to #141
@ghost ghost added needs-triage For new issues customer-reported identify a customer issue question labels May 26, 2023
@rajeshkamal5050 rajeshkamal5050 added this to the Backlog milestone Jun 1, 2023
@savannahostrowski savannahostrowski added the pm Requires PM spec or in-depth input before implementation label Jun 9, 2023
@ghost ghost removed the needs-triage For new issues label Jun 9, 2023
@savannahostrowski
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @JayDoubleu. We have had a couple asks related to azd support of different tooling scenarios. I'm collecting some requirements. Will follow up when I have more! Thanks for raising this!

@savannahostrowski savannahostrowski self-assigned this Jun 9, 2023
@savannahostrowski
Copy link
Contributor

@JayDoubleu Can you provide a bit more insight on what other operations you'd want to use this functionality for beyond deployment planning (we added a flag for that in the v1.2.0 release of azd - https://devblogs.microsoft.com/azure-sdk/azure-developer-cli-azd-august-2023-release/#preview-provisioning-changes-with-azd-provision-preview)?

In general, I'd prefer azd play nicely with other CLIs in a developer's workflow and provide differentiated value over wrapping the commands of other CLIs.

@gkulin gkulin assigned gkulin and unassigned savannahostrowski Dec 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@gkulin gkulin

Labels
customer-reported identify a customer issue pm Requires PM spec or in-depth input before implementation question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@savannahostrowski @rajeshkamal5050 @JayDoubleu @gkulin