Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MQ Goals] ARM Template for java Feature/live test resource mgmt #6801

Closed
wants to merge 45 commits into from

Conversation

hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor

@hemanttanwar hemanttanwar commented Dec 12, 2019

Our goal is to create common Azure resources using ARM template for each module. And pipeline to manage common resources and drop them in end. This will save cost and remove unwanted resources after test is complete or stopped in between

There will be one ARM template per service. For example Storage will have one common arm template for Queue, File and Blob.

The pipeline will run ARM template and create common resources for example resource group, Accounts etc.

The pipeline will pass on names of these resources as ENV variable into test. For example AZURE_APPCONFIG_CONNECTION_STRING

In the end pipeline will also delete these common resources which it created earlier and that will cause all the resources created to be removed.

@hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run java - appconfiguration - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Pull request contains merge conflicts.

@hemanttanwar hemanttanwar changed the title [MQ Goals] ARM Template for Feature/live test resource mgmt [MQ Goals] ARM Template for java Feature/live test resource mgmt Dec 12, 2019
@hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run java - appconfiguration - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines failed to run 1 pipeline(s).

@hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run java - keyvault- tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run java - keyvault - ci

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run java - storage - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor Author

hemanttanwar commented Jan 8, 2020

@alzimmermsft I have added needed Roles for storage account for test. Have a look at the pipeline run https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/internal/_build/results?buildId=228040&view=logs&j=d4b67cd2-6572-561e-035e-54acb01c3f6e&t=e0165002-68ce-55b0-d006-544d028d5587

If no more resource creation is needed for storage test, Can we consider storage ARM template complete ?

@hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run java - eventhubs - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member

@alzimmermsft I have added needed Roles for storage account for test. Have a look at the pipeline run https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/internal/_build/results?buildId=228040&view=logs&j=d4b67cd2-6572-561e-035e-54acb01c3f6e&t=e0165002-68ce-55b0-d006-544d028d5587

If no more resource creation is needed for storage test, Can we consider storage ARM template complete ?

Those tests look to be running correctly, the failing tests have been seen outside the scope of this change.

@hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run java - eventhubs - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run java - eventhubs - data

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@hemanttanwar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this PR as this work was distributed in other PR specific to each library. And they are complete.

@weshaggard weshaggard deleted the feature/live-test-resource-mgmt branch February 3, 2020 17:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants