Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Schema Registry] Add convenience layer for SchemaRegistryClient #10437

Closed
ramya-rao-a opened this issue Aug 4, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

[Schema Registry] Add convenience layer for SchemaRegistryClient #10437

ramya-rao-a opened this issue Aug 4, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Schema Registry

Comments

@ramya-rao-a
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is a follow up for #10076

Using the Java SchemaRegistryClient as a reference, add a convenience layer to the generated client in @azure/schema-registry package applying TypeScript SDK guidelines.

The corresponding package in Java has interfaces for Codec and Serializer. As part of this issue, we will be not be focusing on these and only be adding a layer over the auto generated code.

@ghost ghost added the needs-triage This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. label Aug 4, 2020
@ramya-rao-a ramya-rao-a added Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Schema Registry labels Aug 4, 2020
@ghost ghost removed the needs-triage This is a new issue that needs to be triaged to the appropriate team. label Aug 4, 2020
@ramya-rao-a ramya-rao-a added this to the [2020] September milestone Aug 4, 2020
@ramya-rao-a
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ignore caching as part of this task, we can explore that in #10438

@nguerrera
Copy link
Contributor

Ha, I was just typing a comment that we should probably exclude caching in the first pass, given the uncertainty in the Java review about which layer should handle this and so on. :)

@nguerrera
Copy link
Contributor

#10602 is out for review that implements the convenience layer + unit tests. Samples and setting package to publish to follow after that.

@nguerrera
Copy link
Contributor

This is now done. Samples and setting packages to publish included in #10890

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 12, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Schema Registry
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants