[Feature Request] AAD client assertions should be computed using SHA 256 and an approved padding scheme

[bgavrilMS]

MSAL client type

Confidential

Problem Statement

When MSAL creates the client assertion, it uses PKCS1 padding for digital signature and SHA1 as x5t claim. These are old crypto algorithms and we need to move to newer versions. The STS is building support.

See ESTS work items :

https://identitydivision.visualstudio.com/Engineering/_workitems/edit/2655345
https://identitydivision.visualstudio.com/Engineering/_workitems/edit/2704466

Proposed solution

Use x5t#s256 and PSS padding when talking to ESTS, CIAM, B2C(?) but not with ADFS.

[bgavrilMS]

This seems to be in prod now, but I am not sure B2C, CIAM, dSTS etc. have this. Let's have a flexible solution for now.