参考文献间距太大

[hellobiek]

这个间距怎么调整？

[JosephPeng]

目前模板中有这个问题？待确认。
参考文献间距调整可参考 http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_5e16f1770100ldv5.html 以及 http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_5e16f1770100k9hk.html

[hellobiek]

http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_5e16f1770100k9hk.html
中好像可以解决这个问题，但是我不知道把
\usepackage[numbers,sort&compress]{natbib}
\setlength{\bibsep}{0.5ex} % vertical spacing between references
放在什么地方.......

[JosephPeng]

@huxuan Could you send a pull to fix this bug?
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_5e16f1770100ldv5.html This might be the solution for this bug.

[hellobiek]

谢谢指导 ，但是我现在的参考文献的标题的“参考文献”几个字变成了 “reference”了.....

[hellobiek]

而且还不居中了。我的命令就是
\usepackage{bibspacing}
\setlength{\bibspacing}{\baselineskip}

[hellobiek]

\newdimen\bibindent
\setlength\bibindent{1.5em}
\newdimen\bibspacing
\setlength\bibspacing\z@
\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]{%
\section*{\refname
@mkboth{\MakeUppercase\refname}{\MakeUppercase\refname}}%
\list{@biblabel{@Arabic\c@enumiv}}%
{\settowidth\labelwidth{@biblabel{#1}}%
\leftmargin\labelwidth
\advance\leftmargin\labelsep
\itemsep\z@skip % should this be commented out?
\parsep\z@skip % should this be commented out?
@OpenBib@code
\usecounter{enumiv}%
\let\p@enumiv@empty
\renewcommand\theenumiv{@Arabic\c@enumiv}}%
\sloppy\clubpenalty4000\widowpenalty4000%
\sfcode\.\@m} {\def\@noitemerr {\@latex@warning{Emptythebibliography' environment}}%
\endlist}

上面的这段代码 哪里改了名字了？改了居中？

[JosephPeng]

目测把 \setlength{\bibsep}{0.5ex} 加在下面的代码后面即可。

\bibliographystyle{buaathesis} % 参考文献格式
\RequirePackage[sort&compress]{natbib}
    \bibpunct{[}{]}{,}{n}{}{}

关于bibspacing或natbibspacing这个包为啥会引起你所说的问题，这个还有待研究。

[huxuan]

hi, I would rather classify this issue as a problem rather than a bug.
We can simply add \setlength{\bibsep}{0.5ex} in sample-[master|bachelor].tex before \begin{document} to achieve the goal.
I would like to introduce such kind of customization in buaacthesis.cls as less as possible. As it's not clearly defined by school and default style not seems to be too bad.

[hellobiek]

Yes,I agree with the "problem" idea.

[JosephPeng]

@huxuan I don't think the redundant space after reference items is necessary, i.e. do nothing about that is not recommended.
There is no redundant space after reference items in most of published books or thesis. So I think the this issue's problem might(should) be solved rather than leave it alone.

[huxuan]

@JosephPeng Then what's the space do you think is the suitable one?
After searching on the Internet, there are two main length, one is 0pt and the other is 0.5ex

[JosephPeng]

@huxuan the \baselineskip might be the suitable space for that. I don't know the exact distance.

[huxuan]

@JosephPeng I have tried \baselineskip but this will create one extra empty line between each bib items.

[grissiom]

I think we have misunderstood what \bibsep means. natbib.pdf said:

\bibsep
The vertical spacing between references in the list, whether author-year
or numerical, is controlled by the length\bibsep. If this is set to 0 pt, there
is no extra line spacing between references. The default spacing depends
on the font size selected in\documentclass, and is almost a full blank line.
Change this by redening\bibsepwith\setlengthcommand.

It means the extra space between items but not the absolute space. So it seems better to set bibsep to 0.

[huxuan]

@grissiom The problem we need to judge now is just the space length between bib items.
因为全局大部分正文的行距都是1.5倍行距吧，所以单纯的置为0是不是也有些不妥？
Maybe 0.5\baselineskip better?
主要感觉自己没明白行距这些东西具体的定义……

[JosephPeng]

@huxuan @grissiom Thanks for your explanations, in my opinion, set the bibsep to 0pt might be the perfect choice for now.
i.e. add the command \setlength{\bibsep}{0pt} after the command \RequirePackage[sort&compress]{natbib} .
Plus, in the natbib.pdf, what the command \bibsep says "The default spacing depends on the font size selected in \documentclass, and is almost a full blank line.", "If this is set to 0 pt, there is no extra line spacing between references."

[huxuan]

OK, then I will update it as soon as possible.