Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Minor: Naming inconsistencies of block types #38

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jan 5, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Minor: Naming inconsistencies of block types #38

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jan 5, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
auto-migrated Priority-Medium Type-Defect

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link 

The block type names defined in table 8 on page 17 do not correspondent the 
headings of the specific block type section.

For example:
Texture vs BitmapTexture
StandardMaterial vs SimpleMaterial

I know this is rather cosmetic, but I think it would be nice if we stick with 
one name to make it less "confusing".

Original issue reported on code.google.com by pr...@ibbgdv.de on 13 Aug 2012 at 11:17
@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author 

Of course. The spec is WIP and any inconsistencies like this are due to late 
changes before the format was locked down. Thanks for pointing them out.

Original comment by bengtric...@gmail.com on 13 Aug 2012 at 11:19

  • Changed state: Accepted

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
auto-migrated Priority-Medium Type-Defect
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@GoogleCodeExporter