Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds django_db_geventpool.backends.postgresql_psycopg2 as supported database #166

Conversation

aemitos
Copy link

@aemitos aemitos commented Nov 4, 2020

Description

We've been using django-cachalot in a production environment for a while and after questioning about that on the Slack help page, it was recommended the addition of django_db_geventpool.backends.postgresql_psycopg2 as a supported database.

Adding django_db_geventpool.backends.postgresql_psycopg2 as supported database.

Rationale

I'm not sure how to add a test for it but it's being used for at least 5 months in a production environment.

It would remove the warning from deployments using the django_db_geventpool.

@Andrew-Chen-Wang
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @aemitos Check out our settings page to add a supported backend, specifically: CACHALOT_DATABASES

https://django-cachalot.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 668

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 98.649%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 667: -0.3%
Covered Lines: 3213
Relevant Lines: 3257

💛 - Coveralls

8 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 668

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 98.649%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 667: -0.3%
Covered Lines: 3213
Relevant Lines: 3257

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 668

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 98.649%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 667: -0.3%
Covered Lines: 3213
Relevant Lines: 3257

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 668

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 98.649%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 667: -0.3%
Covered Lines: 3213
Relevant Lines: 3257

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 668

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 98.649%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 667: -0.3%
Covered Lines: 3213
Relevant Lines: 3257

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 668

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 98.649%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 667: -0.3%
Covered Lines: 3213
Relevant Lines: 3257

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 668

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 98.649%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 667: -0.3%
Covered Lines: 3213
Relevant Lines: 3257

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 668

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 98.649%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 667: -0.3%
Covered Lines: 3213
Relevant Lines: 3257

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 668

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 98.649%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 667: -0.3%
Covered Lines: 3213
Relevant Lines: 3257

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 4, 2020

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 668

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 98.956%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 667: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 3223
Relevant Lines: 3257

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants