New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upside down thread #160
Comments
With threaded display, the last received messages gets inserted into the thread tree at the appropriate location, an many cases at the end, or somewhere in the middle. That's a disadvantage of the threaded view. But how else could it be done in a hierarchical tree? Can you send a mock-up as a suggestion? |
The upside down ones is what I'm looking at. The idea is that the most recent message in the thread is on top. Currently, if the thread is collapsed, (at least in the Unified View), I can't actually see that there is a new message. Doing it this way, new messages relating to the thread will appear on top. It also follows logically because when you reply to each message, the quoted message follows I hope this makes it clearer. Thanks. |
That's a great solution, and consistent with the current implementation. Thanks for considering my suggestion. |
This won't happen right now, we're preparing for version 115 to be released in the summer. But we keep the request on file. |
Oh please, no rush. I just thought this would be something others and I would find useful as well. Thanks for considering this request. |
Hi All,
I've been trying all sort of things, as well as various extensions. If you take a look at the following:
You can see that the latest email in the thread is on the bottom of the thread. I still want everything sorted by the date descending, but for threads, I'd like to see the latest email at the top (this is similar to Outlook I believe), this way, I prioritize the latest in the thread and can probably collapse the thread to be able to fit more emails in the pane.
Is this something that be done in Betterbird? Or is this part of an extension? Or is this not a capability that is available at this time?
If it is not available, could I ask that this be an enhancement for the future please?
Many thanks.
b
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: