We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Summary:
评价word embedding的方法只依靠word similarity benchmark不好,所以本文提出了vivo,通过一系列的downstream tasks来评价word embeddings。还有online的版本,提交后就能自动进行评价。
Resource:
Paper information:
Notes:
关于评价的话,其实可以多用几个数据集,来证明一下,基于character的语言的coverage对于NER的评判 (让评价更方便的系统,也可以写一篇论文)
Model Graph:
Result::
Thoughts:
Next Reading:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
BrambleXu
No branches or pull requests
Summary:
评价word embedding的方法只依靠word similarity benchmark不好,所以本文提出了vivo,通过一系列的downstream tasks来评价word embeddings。还有online的版本,提交后就能自动进行评价。
Resource:
Paper information:
Notes:
关于评价的话,其实可以多用几个数据集,来证明一下,基于character的语言的coverage对于NER的评判
(让评价更方便的系统,也可以写一篇论文)
Model Graph:
Result::
Thoughts:
Next Reading:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: