Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing equipment for physical sensors in water and air systems #595

Open
PeteHart opened this issue Dec 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Missing equipment for physical sensors in water and air systems #595

PeteHart opened this issue Dec 8, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@PeteHart
Copy link

PeteHart commented Dec 8, 2023

While modelling Scandinavian heating systems, typically comprising both water and ventilation systems in the same building, we’re missing the possibility to add an Equipment representing the physical sensor to which the Point:Sensor sub class is associated.

While it is possible to abstract away the physical sensor by associating the Point:Sensor to an active equipment (such as a pump or a rotating heat exchanger) we find that we often have several physical sensors in a pipe or as part of the air handling system and they are in reality not associated with such a specific active equipment in the system.

We’ve considered to model using an Equipment:WaterDistribution in water systems and then associating the Point:Sensor to that Equipment. However, we find that in most of our cases we really want to be able to model all active equipment, including the physical sensors. Also we have not found a similar “air distribution” for air systems. Thought I suspect that the similar equipment to a water distribution (pipes) would be Equipment:AirPlenum?

Consequently, we suggest to either add a new sub class SensorEquipment (or SensingEquipment) under Equipment or alternatively add a new sub class Sensor under HVACEquipment. In either case the new sub class may include two subclasses; ActiveSensorEquipment and PassiveSensorEquipment reflecting upon the construction principles of the physical sensor.

If included in BRICK 1.4 we will backport to REC for our 4.1 release.

@efjerb
Copy link

efjerb commented Feb 9, 2024

Pr. @gtfierro's previous response to my issue (#521), it appears such a class already exists

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants