The enumerations for the auc:Tightness
and auc:TightnessFitCondition
elements are very similar (one uses the term "Leaky"; whereas, the other uses the term "Loose").
The auc:Tightness
element is strictly more expressive, since it includes "Very Tight" and "Very Leaky" enumerations.
Adding the enumerations "Very Tight" and "Very Loose" to the auc:TightnessFitCondition
element introduces unnecessary redundancy.
This proposal is to:
- Reify the
auc:Tightness
enumeration into a newxs:simpleType
. - Modify the definitions of the
auc:Tightness
andauc:TightnessFitCondition
elements to reuse the newauc:Tightness
enumeration.
This is a breaking change.
Occurrences of "Loose" in the auc:TightnessFitCondition
element must be replaced with "Leaky".
n/a