Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changed build requirements packages for Centos #58

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

danpawlik
Copy link
Contributor

Some packages have been changed the name, so
building bup was problematic.

We discuss code changes on the mailing list bup-list@googlegroups.com,
but if you'd prefer to begin the process with a pull request, that's
just fine. We're happy to have the help.

In any case, please make sure each commit includes a

Signed-off-by: Someone someone@some.where

line in the commit message that matches the "Author" line so that
we'll be able to include your work in the project. See
./SIGNED-OFF-BY for the meaning:

https://github.com/bup/bup/blob/master/SIGNED-OFF-BY

After you submit the pull request, someone will eventually redirect it
to the list for review, and you will of course be included in the
conversation there.

On the other hand, if you're comfortable with "git send-email" (or the
equivalent), please post your patches to the list as described in the
"Submitting Patches" section in ./HACKING:

https://github.com/bup/bup/blob/master/HACKING

README.md Outdated
yum install fuse-python pyxattr
yum install perl-Time-HiRes
yum install readline-devel # optional (bup ftp)
yum install python-tornado # optional (bup web)
yum install python-tornado-doc # optional (bup web)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that seems odd, why would we care about the documentation?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we don't care, I can change it like it was earlier.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jmberg done

@rlbdv
Copy link
Member

rlbdv commented Dec 16, 2020

...and once we've consider jmberg's question, would you be comfortable with a Signed-off-by psuedo-header in the commit?

https://github.com/bup/bup/blob/master/SIGNED-OFF-BY

Thanks

@danpawlik
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rlbdv Sure.

Some packages have been changed the name, so
building bup was problematic.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Pawlik <dpawlik@redhat.com>
@danpawlik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do we care about Centos 8? Current package build is focused on Centos 7.

@rlbdv
Copy link
Member

rlbdv commented Dec 19, 2020

Without knowing Centos well, I'd imagine ideally, we'd probably want to focus (at least) on whatever the current stable release is.

@rlbdv rlbdv added the pending Accepted and should be in next push label Dec 19, 2020
@rlbdv
Copy link
Member

rlbdv commented Dec 20, 2020

Incorporated as ec26ee2.

@rlbdv rlbdv closed this Dec 20, 2020
@rlbdv rlbdv removed the pending Accepted and should be in next push label Dec 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants