You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is more of a discussion than an issue, but I'd like to contribute BLS12-381 and BLS signature test vectors, especially serialization related ones, if there is interest for supporting these "newer" curves and algorithms.
However I don't think these are part of BouncyCastle at all.
Is that a blocker or are you welcoming all test-vectors from all kind of algorithms?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't know much about the goals and directions of the C2SP project, hence I don't know much about the focus. Anyway, the main criterion for me is whether an algorithm has been described in a rather stable standards-like document.
BouncyCastle support is not necessary for anything. The one nice thing with Java is essentially that the JCE interface allows to write a test once and then run it against multiple providers (of course under the somewhat optimistic assumption that every provider agrees on the interface).
This is more of a discussion than an issue, but I'd like to contribute BLS12-381 and BLS signature test vectors, especially serialization related ones, if there is interest for supporting these "newer" curves and algorithms.
However I don't think these are part of BouncyCastle at all.
Is that a blocker or are you welcoming all test-vectors from all kind of algorithms?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: