-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong naming for records and array #40
Comments
Uuups. Using V4? Can you put some context lines lines of the created c file (OD.c/h or CO_OD.c/h) |
|
Got it, please try the latest bugfix branch (029e57e) |
Sorry for the delay. It looks correct. Could you provide binaries? |
Yes, but it might take some days. |
Released v4.0-103-g029e57e |
It is still not fixed. (Source of the problem: robincornelius@af4d323#diff-d444f21db6a5f27fef9ee46f265a188fc674e24a1502b1150256ac81bf2fa2fb) I did a quick check. Otherwise exporter to V4 seems to produce correct output. Could you provide new binaries? |
Janez, you are absolutely right. Sorry, I must have deleted it by mistake. I will provide new binaries! |
Done, please test and close if successfully. |
It works, thanks. |
With new release v4.0-102-g634dee9 i have a problem with "ODT_RECORD" and "ODT_ARRAY", because in CANopenNode/301/CO_ODinterface.c it's called "ODT_REC" and "ODT_ARR".
@Barzello
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: