-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fully_sampled_recon_three_chains fails #293
Comments
|
@evgueni-ovtchinnikov I've moved this issue here. I have checked that on my VM both the notebook and actual demo work fine. However, on an archlinux install both fail. This could be a gadgetron server issue but Gadgetron's unit-tests and integration tests work. I have no clue what to do about it. would it help if I see if I can give you access to the archlinux system? |
@KrisThielemans: access to archlinux would certainly help - how else can i investigate what goes wrong there :) |
we've seen problems with the other Gadgetron demos returning only 1 image as opposed to both repetitions. Seems to be related to reading the ISMRMRD file. |
@evgueni-ovtchinnikov I've tried rebuilding with our version of HDF5 as opposed to the system one. Same problem unfortunately. |
we have this same problem now on the new VM. Everything is fine until here https://github.com/CCPPETMR/SIRF/blob/ea4a56f9f07ae5a17d74887fbca002dc69313b5c/examples/Python/MR/Gadgetron/fully_sampled_recon_three_chains.py#L109 c=complex_image_data.as_array()
c.shape returns However, the extracted array is not https://github.com/CCPPETMR/SIRF/blob/ea4a56f9f07ae5a17d74887fbca002dc69313b5c/examples/Python/MR/Gadgetron/fully_sampled_recon_three_chains.py#L114-L118
|
This could be a Gadgetron change/bug I guess. |
caused by bugs in new ExtractGadget, Gadgetron issue gadgetron/gadgetron#743 created |
They fixed one bug in |
If you want to try to build Gadgetron master there's a SuperBuild branch and also a related draft PR SyneRBI/SIRF-SuperBuild#438 |
At present,
image_array
hasshape
[0,0,0]
.complex_image_data
seems alright though (its shape afteras_array
is[2,256,256]
).I haven't checked the corresponding SIRF demo.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: