Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pulse-net support - Add to metadata and ability to save files in the same container but in folders based on metadata #97

Open
cosmycx opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@cosmycx
Copy link
Collaborator

cosmycx commented May 22, 2023

Plan A:

  • [ ] Add folder location to metadata
  • [ ] Code change to accept new metadata
  • [ ] Code change to save files in container/folder based on metadata

Plan B:

Another idea discussed was to just a custom metadata field, then it would be on the receiver side to filter out and pick files from the same container based on the new field.

Notes
At this time pulse-net is looking into which plan would work or if both would be ok.
Would be needed by June-12, on pulse-net side by June-19

@cosmycx cosmycx self-assigned this May 22, 2023
@cosmycx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cosmycx commented May 26, 2023

Should be good for release 1.2 - there is no date at this time for this release.

@rmharrison rmharrison added the enhancement New feature or request label May 26, 2023
@cosmycx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cosmycx commented Jun 5, 2023

discussion with @mkrystof

Every program/event type to have 2 config files:

  • metadata config ( existing already )

BulkFileUploadFunction:

  • program config (Immutable once set per program/event) - to be coded ( storage config, etc.. ) - to be developed - just 3 configs today to get started
    example: container_folder,
    file_name[filename, meta_ext_filename, original_filename],
    file_name_suffix[none(we need storage versioning), tick],
    folder_structure:[root, date_YYYY_MM_DD]

@mkrystof mkrystof self-assigned this Jun 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants