-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8564_ for Books and Proceedings #178
Labels
Comments
the ticket concerns making a decision about how should we migrate subfields _x, _8, _s as they probably contain legacy specific information <- to check, example record: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2312429/export/hm?ln=en |
This was referenced Mar 26, 2019
Closed
As discussed _x is legacy connected information to be decided what to do. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In this field, we find 3 types of information:
Question: regarding this 3rd case, for the time being, there is no rule for the subfields 8564_ $$x, $$8 and $$s for the time being, because I did not know how you want to handle this in the new system. Should this information be migrated? And where?
( requires #200 )
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: