Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CTAN: update support link of CTeX bbs on CTAN #393

Open
Liam0205 opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 11 comments
Open

CTAN: update support link of CTeX bbs on CTAN #393

Liam0205 opened this issue Nov 30, 2018 · 11 comments

Comments

@Liam0205
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, http://bbs.ctex.org/forum.php is set for several packages on CTAN. However, the forum was shut down since Nov. 21, 2018.

image

Early today, an email from the CTAN team shows concern of the dead link problem. Since @wulingyun hasn't posted any response to this thread, we don't have any valuable response about this issue right now. In the response to the team, the situation was addressed, and the team said they will not remove the link until any new update is synced to them.

This issue is opened for a tracking, and for a discussion about replacing http://bbs.ctex.org/forum.php to https://github.com/CTeX-org/ctex-kit/issues/, if the bbs will never be rebooted again.

So, let's vote for the new link.

@Liam0205
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Liam0205
Copy link
Contributor Author

Liam0205 commented Nov 30, 2018

The original email from the team.

Hi folks,
The link http://bbs.ctex.org/forum.php which appears in catalogue
entries of packages

ctex-faq, ctex, zhnumber, zhlineskip, xecjk and xpinyin

is dead.

Please advise. Thank you.

@wulingyun
Copy link
Member

Please replace the link to GitHub.

I have replied to google groups in Nov. 27, and it seems there was something wrong with the reply email.

The forum was closed due to the administrative requirements of beian (see www.beian.gov.cn for more information). Since it is difficult to meet the requirements, I can not see any chance to reopen the forum in near future.

@Liam0205
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wulingyun Got it.

Finally we have an official response.

Appreciation should be shown to you, Linyun, for your continuous support for the CTeX site and forum, and our community.

Best!

@wulingyun
Copy link
Member

@Liam0205 My pleasure.

If you guys have any suggestion on the substitution of forum or the website, please let me know.

Thanks all guys for great efforts on ctex-kit and other projects.

@Liam0205
Copy link
Contributor Author

Liam0205 commented Nov 30, 2018

@wulingyun For me personally, rebuilding the forum is not something in emergency, since we have so many ways to discuss TeX nowadays. Considering that there are many precious historical discussions on the forum, building an archive of these discussions that could be indexed by search engines makes sense.

@wulingyun
Copy link
Member

@Liam0205 Agree, it is also what I want to do. But I did not find any existing approach to build the archive from Discuz. I will try to find some solution.

@Liam0205
Copy link
Contributor Author

Liam0205 commented Dec 4, 2018

@wulingyun
After searching on Google, I found this old thread that might be helpful for the archiving task. Please check it when you're available.

@wulingyun
Copy link
Member

@Liam0205 Thanks.

It is for the very old Discuz 3.12. The current version is Discuz X3.3, which is quite different from the interface to database.

@Liam0205
Copy link
Contributor Author

Liam0205 commented Dec 5, 2018

@wulingyun Well, I didn't notice it. So we'll have to find some alternatives.

@Liam0205
Copy link
Contributor Author

Liam0205 commented Dec 5, 2018

@wulingyun If the database of the forum is available to read, and no official archive method could be found in near future, parsing the database and building a static site for search engine indexing is valuable for corsideration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants