You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I looked through CoL of 2023-08-17: it has 4,065 accepted trinomial names with rank "Infraspecific Name". It's a nonsense. Accepted trinomials in Animalia should have a rank "Subspecies".
@gdower, do you have an ability to change status for all accepted trinomials in Animalia to "Subspecies"?
Or, if necessary, can we re-visit all source GSDs in CLB and make correction in their data? It looks like, majority names came from Jewel Beetles & Taxapad Ichneumonoidea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I looked through CoL of 2023-08-17: it has 4,065 accepted trinomial names with rank "Infraspecific Name". It's a nonsense. Accepted trinomials in Animalia should have a rank "Subspecies".
https://www.catalogueoflife.org/data/search?facet=rank&facet=issue&facet=status&facet=nomStatus&facet=nameType&facet=field&facet=authorship&facet=extinct&facet=environment&limit=50&offset=0&rank=infraspecific%20name&reverse=false&sortBy=taxonomic&status=accepted&status=provisionally%20accepted
@gdower, do you have an ability to change status for all accepted trinomials in Animalia to "Subspecies"?
Or, if necessary, can we re-visit all source GSDs in CLB and make correction in their data? It looks like, majority names came from Jewel Beetles & Taxapad Ichneumonoidea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: