Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify copyright on assets textures #11

Closed
eloyesp opened this issue May 9, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #34
Closed

Clarify copyright on assets textures #11

eloyesp opened this issue May 9, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #34

Comments

@eloyesp
Copy link

eloyesp commented May 9, 2019

It seems that copyright of some assets are not clear enough for the Debian team so those files are extracted to a different package celestia-common-nonfree stating that:

This package contains the data files for Celestia that have no DFSG compatible license or an unclear license.

I've been looking and there is no clear mention on the copyright of those files so may be a proper mention of the source and license terms could allow them to merge those packages. Also FSF distros (like trisquel) seems to be removing this package for that reason and there is people missing this package. There are some research made by debian on the bugtracker.

Regards.

@375gnu
Copy link
Member

375gnu commented May 11, 2019

We aware of this and plan for 1.7.0 release cleanup all license issues.

@375gnu 375gnu transferred this issue from CelestiaProject/Celestia Feb 16, 2020
@SevenSpheres
Copy link
Contributor

This was fixed in #34

@SevenSpheres SevenSpheres linked a pull request Nov 19, 2021 that will close this issue
@StefanBruens
Copy link

The README contains a lot of Copyright notices, but hardly any usage licenses.

Should the GPL COPYING file imply these files are (almost) all under the GPL-2.0?

If yes, can you add a short notice to the README, stating "All files are under the GPL-2.0, or another permissive license as stated below."?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants