Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Advice for greater sensitivity to translocations with CuteSV #18

Open
zhemingfan opened this issue Jun 3, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Advice for greater sensitivity to translocations with CuteSV #18

zhemingfan opened this issue Jun 3, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@zhemingfan
Copy link

Hi @mchaisso and @Jingwen7 ,

I'm currently running some tests with LRA+CuteSV, and I'm looking for 1-2 known translocations, but LRA+CuteSV isn't able to find it. I was wondering if either of you had thoughts on how to get LRA+CuteSV to call more translocations.

@Jingwen7
Copy link
Collaborator

Jingwen7 commented Jun 3, 2021

Hi @zhemingfan ,

Are you using public data? If possible, could you provide the data link and the locations of the translocations you are looking at? I can check if lra misses the translocations and which parameters can improve that.

@zhemingfan
Copy link
Author

Hi @Jingwen7 ,

The data we're using is not public unfortunately - I'm working to see if I can find you a public dataset.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants