Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

quick refactor to make a future pull request more focused #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 29, 2016

Conversation

QuotableWater7
Copy link
Contributor

We can use reduce here to easily get the result of applying the transformations
without overwriting the original email variable.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 28, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 98.75% when pulling 363b81e on jt-changes into 62100ce on master.

@QuotableWater7
Copy link
Contributor Author

facepalm

We can use `reduce` here to easily get the result of applying the transformations
without overwriting the original `email` variable.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 28, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 98.75% when pulling e968e39 on jt-changes into 62100ce on master.

@QuotableWater7
Copy link
Contributor Author

bump - any thoughts?

@mockdeep mockdeep merged commit a6d5b89 into master Jun 29, 2016
@mockdeep mockdeep deleted the jt-changes branch June 29, 2016 19:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants