Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Context Menu for chats has too large font size on high DPI systems #752

Open
RAnders00 opened this issue Oct 4, 2018 · 4 comments
Open
Labels
bug Something isn't working as intended, or works in a confusing/unintuitive way for the user high dpi

Comments

@RAnders00
Copy link
Collaborator

The context menu avaible by clicking the three dots on a chat has a scaling issue on high DPI (in my case 2x scaling) systems. The entries in the context menu themselves seem to be an appropriate size, but the text inside is too large. See the image below.

context menu

Using latest master (39a8e81)

@RAnders00 RAnders00 changed the title Context Menu for chats has too large font size Context Menu for chats has too large font size on high DPI systems Oct 4, 2018
@RAnders00
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Same issue on tab context menu:

sameissue

@TranRed
Copy link
Contributor

TranRed commented Oct 24, 2018

same issue with links

grafik

@ALazyMeme ALazyMeme added the bug Something isn't working as intended, or works in a confusing/unintuitive way for the user label Aug 27, 2021
@jupjohn
Copy link
Contributor

jupjohn commented May 24, 2024

I believe this has been fixed (or at least the message context menu has) by #4868. I've had one user who was experiencing it on stable no longer observe it on a3ef8a1 (c7.)

@pajlada
Copy link
Member

pajlada commented May 24, 2024

We believe it's fixed on Windows, but we're not sure about other operating systems (read macOS)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working as intended, or works in a confusing/unintuitive way for the user high dpi
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants