You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Especially concerning the «replay» feature... Why a permanent live can't be seen again later if it is permanent? There are a lot of misunderstanding and confusion. Even for people who know the difference, it is sometimes confusing.
And we need a term for the opposite: non-permanent lives. So we can explain easily to users.
Describe the solution you would like:
First, I think that the checkbox «this is a permanent live» in the video properties should be replaced by a radio button, with 2 choices.
Then, we need to find names for these two choices.
For example, «permanent live» could be replaced by something like «reccurent live».
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Normal Live: the stream will be saved, transcoded and published like any other video. Recurring Live: the stream will not be saved, transcoded or published, but you can use the same URL to have multiple streams.
Describe the problem to be solved
As discussed (in french) here https://framacolibri.org/t/petit-retour-sur-deux-soirees-live/11406 , when explaining to content creator what means the «this is a permanent live» checkbox, the situation is not clear and is ambiguous.
Especially concerning the «replay» feature... Why a permanent live can't be seen again later if it is permanent? There are a lot of misunderstanding and confusion. Even for people who know the difference, it is sometimes confusing.
And we need a term for the opposite: non-permanent lives. So we can explain easily to users.
Describe the solution you would like:
First, I think that the checkbox «this is a permanent live» in the video properties should be replaced by a radio button, with 2 choices.
Then, we need to find names for these two choices.
For example, «permanent live» could be replaced by something like «reccurent live».
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: