Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verifying PeerTube instance ownership on Mastodon #5429

Open
bristow opened this issue Nov 24, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Verifying PeerTube instance ownership on Mastodon #5429

bristow opened this issue Nov 24, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@bristow
Copy link

bristow commented Nov 24, 2022

Describe the problem to be solved

On Mastodon, you can verify your ownership of a website by inserting a link to your Mastodon account with the rel=« me » option included.

Is there any way to insert this code on the front page of a PeerTube instance without a custom homepage and only with an admin account ?

I have a link to my PeerTube instance on my Mastodon profile, and it would be nice to make it turn green by using this code.

Thanks a lot 👍

Describe the solution you would like

A simply way to verify an Peertube instance :)

@stevolucidity
Copy link

If you're the admin you can add the link to <peertube-latest>/client/dist/$your_locale/index.html.

@bristow
Copy link
Author

bristow commented Nov 25, 2022

admin but not adminsys.

And we use Docker...

@Chocobozzz
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

Our custom markdown is able to correctly parse <a rel="me" href=""></a> links. So can add this link in the description of your instance for example, and put /about/instance as path for mastodon if it can parse JS to render the page.

@fflorent
Copy link
Contributor

AFAIK, it does not render the verification mechanism does not parse JS:
mastodon/mastodon#16322 (comment)

This issue will probably allow to solve the issue of PeerTube instance verification Mastodon-side:
mastodon/mastodon#20030

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants