Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#675 cascading typedefs patch #740

Merged
1 commit merged into from
Apr 5, 2018
Merged

Conversation

ylil93
Copy link
Contributor

@ylil93 ylil93 commented Apr 5, 2018

  • update generator to differentiate typedefs with the same base type
  • added sanity test case
  • generated documentation is wrong (api model/builder issue)

- update generator to differentiate typedefs with the same base type
- added sanity test case
- generated documentation is wrong (api model/builder issue)
@ghost ghost merged commit 9e715b5 into CiscoDevNet:master Apr 5, 2018
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 5, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #740 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #740      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.52%   80.53%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         171      171              
  Lines       16457    16458       +1     
  Branches     1495     1495              
==========================================
+ Hits        13252    13255       +3     
+ Misses       2836     2835       -1     
+ Partials      369      368       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
ydkgen/api_model.py 78.82% <100%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
ydkgen/builder/_api_model_builder.py 84.87% <0%> (+0.73%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a674ade...7350ea9. Read the comment docs.

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant