Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Give the option to allow viewing network by interface rather than only showing grouped data #52

Open
ClementTsang opened this issue Feb 28, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
feature Requests for a new feature.

Comments

@ClementTsang
Copy link
Owner

Describe the feature request

Why should we consider this feature request? Describe why, and/or how you think this feature will solve the issue, or overall improve the application:

Currently we grab networks and sum them together as a lump sum. RX, TX, etc. are all a summation of all interfaces.

We also already grab that data, we just toss away the individual data when we collect it and merge it all together.

This would be a config/flag feature. Toggling within app might also be possible but eh, then we would have to collect and save both total and separate data.

Additional context/details

Provide any additional context or details here. What needs to be done, why, etc:

@ClementTsang ClementTsang added the feature Requests for a new feature. label Feb 28, 2020
@ClementTsang ClementTsang changed the title Give the option to allow viewing network by interface rather than grouped Give the option to allow viewing network by interface rather than only showing grouped data Feb 28, 2020
@ClementTsang ClementTsang added this to To do in 0.6.0 via automation Nov 22, 2020
@ClementTsang ClementTsang moved this from To do to In progress in 0.6.0 Feb 16, 2021
@ClementTsang ClementTsang removed this from In progress in 0.6.0 Feb 28, 2021
@xgdgsc
Copy link
Contributor

xgdgsc commented Jul 26, 2022

Is it hard to also add per process sorting of network usage?

@ClementTsang
Copy link
Owner Author

@xgdgsc might be tricky to get network usage per-process, would need to look into it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Requests for a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants