Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I don't know how to use CocoaLumberjack in a static library. #694

Closed
medisean opened this issue Mar 14, 2016 · 8 comments
Closed

I don't know how to use CocoaLumberjack in a static library. #694

medisean opened this issue Mar 14, 2016 · 8 comments

Comments

@medisean
Copy link

As title.

@rivera-ernesto
Copy link
Member

Please take a look at #337, #676 and #172. I can't find the proper documentation we had. @bpoplauschi did we delete it because it was outdated?

Ideally static libraries (3rd party frameworks) should not require CocoaLumberjack, but use it only when available.

@medisean
Copy link
Author

Thank you.

@rivera-ernesto
Copy link
Member

Also feel free to update/add documentation with your findings if you can.

@bpoplauschi
Copy link
Member

@rivera-ernesto all the documentation was moved to https://github.com/CocoaLumberjack/CocoaLumberjack/tree/master/Documentation so we version it properly and allow people to edit it via PR. I don't remember deleting any docs.

@hons82
Copy link

hons82 commented Sep 20, 2016

I'm currently writing a framework in swift where I have a dependency on CocoaLumberjack, now I've read this issue, so I'd like to ask if there is a documentation on how this "use it only when available." can be achieved in a Swift framework

Thanks

@bpoplauschi
Copy link
Member

@hons82 I have no idea

@hons82
Copy link

hons82 commented Sep 21, 2016

@bpoplauschi :-)

@max-potapov
Copy link

I'm using well CocoaLumberjack in all my libraries and frameworks – they all produces logs, not loggers (http://stackoverflow.com/a/39594499/2778645).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants