-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Velocity Support? #405
Comments
While technically possible, it's unlikely to happen. The reasons behind this are
|
It's been a couple of years since the response on this, but I wanted to check again on whether or not this is a possibility? Absolutely love the plugin and would have to have to leave it behind switch to Velocity for our proxy. I realize it's a bit ironic being titled "Bungee"TabListPlus and supporting Velocity, but it would certainly be an exciting feature, maybe as a premium version? Thanks! |
It's even more funny when you also realize that he made a Spigot version and called if "AdvancedTabOverlay" and not like "SpigotTabListPlus" simply because (iirc) he didn't want to suggest this being an Spigot-exclusive plugin or something. @CodeCrafter47 You should reconsider Velocity support here. Since your post has the API of Velocity changed in many ways including new API features. Additionally is there a v3 of the proxy planned and in development, so perhaps you could give your input for possible additions to the API while it is being redone. |
Yes, I have to agree with Andre here about how Velocity is looking. So much has changed and improved over the last two years, it's a very exciting new platform that seems to be getting far more intuitive with each revision. |
@CodeCrafter47 I would love to see that too :) |
Yes please, and checking again, thanks! |
Velocity supports tab list modification: PaperMC/Velocity#105 |
That would make this pretty simple I think? |
Does even Velocity has better performance than bungee or it doesn't have any sense? |
Yes, that's exactly why it exists. |
You have any comparison? Graphs? |
You can do that research yourself. I'm just here to support this suggestion. |
I did and there is no proper evidence |
I don't really understand why you're arguing with me, I am just here as someone that supports Velocity. You don't have to argue with me because of that. My network uses Velocity and as such we'd like to see a port of this plugin. |
Can you guys just stop? And for the record: Velocity is made by a contributor of Waterfall with the goal of having a better proxy with more performance and better coding standards. Please do proper reseach next time and move this to another place now: |
+1 for velocity support. Would be great to see and is the only plugin holding me back from migrating to the newer proxy. I noticed this fork which has early velocity work done, but not sure how ready it is. |
Since this issue was opened, Velocity improved a lot. Out network moves to Velocity aswell, as Bungee does not support modern Forge. |
There are a few core problems and limitations that make Velocity support harder. For once is Velocity not relying on a basic A workaround for this would be to make the Placeholder stuff use a String as id or a sort of unified GenericPlugin class that would do the job, but that's just some speculation, as there could be other issues and problems here. I myself tried to add Velocity support (See #655) but the above fact and the fact that I would need to also alter other repositories AND deal with SymLink stuff made me decide to not continue this... |
Did you try asking Velocity to add easier implementation of your features? They added some things as I remember, for me personally BTLP is the only thing (other than recoding couple of my plugins) that stops me from migrating to Velocity. |
Would be interesting if this is planed now that waterfall is end of life. |
The main issue is to still figure out what can/should be done on Velocity to achieve a similar set of functionality compared to BungeeCord. |
Also, to further add to this, Paper's announcement of "end of life" for waterfall is kind of a lie. |
I think they not yet is ready to cut the ties to spigot, as it does support more descent plugins than what velocity have. The owner decided to move to velocity due to waterfall is "end of life" and does not have 1.20.1 support yet as velocity have. They are really slow to update waterfall compere to the past, so I think one day we need to move. |
Generally speaking, Velocity support should result in a completely different plugin here... Squeezing it into the already existing codebase of BTLP would be a nightmare to deal with in many ways, so making a clean start with a dedicated, separate plugin would be a much better choice here, at the cost of possibly more work (Also, the name BungeeTabListPlus simply doesn't go well on Velocity, let's be honest). |
Was 1.21 I meant. So a typo. They finally realized waterfall update, it did not exist yesterday. And I agree, it is preferably better make new plugin with same or better functionality for Velocity. The current tab plugins for Velocity is not good at all. |
Would it be possible to add support for Velocity at some point?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: